• @foggy
      link
      542 months ago

      …it

      …it isn’t.

      They should have arresting authority over anyone illegally barring them entry.

        • @gAlienLifeformOP
          link
          8
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If memory serves, Shelby was just about the ability of the DOJ to require states from the former Confederacy to get DOJ’s approval before making any changes to their election laws, where this is about DOJ’s ability to monitor any state’s actual implementation of their election laws

          Either way, illegitimate decision from an illegitimate court that wouldn’t have any precedential value if we lived in a decent country, but yeah, back in the one we actually live in who knows what is and isn’t legal anymore.

          e; DOJs? I’m pretty sure there’s just the one, autocorrect

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            If memory serves, Shelby was just about the ability of the DOJ to require states from the former Confederacy to get DOJ’s approval before making any changes to their election laws, where this is about DOJ’s ability to monitor any state’s actual implementation of their election laws

            This is quite incorrect. I would read the link I provided.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    60
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We allways hear that surveilence and monitoring is good, and that you don’t have to be afraid unless you have something to hide.

    Is this an admission that this isn’t true, or that they have something to hide?

  • @darthsid
    link
    372 months ago

    United States of America is a fucking joke. Pretending to be a democracy.

      • @darthsid
        link
        102 months ago

        He tried his fucking best not to didn’t he? And curious to see if he’ll quit if he wins this time after his turn.