

What I am saying is computers were also marketed as something they were not (yet) and eventually became.
And so, history repeats itself.
What I am saying is computers were also marketed as something they were not (yet) and eventually became.
And so, history repeats itself.
Okay, down vote away. Lemmy has such an ignorant hate boner against AI.
Computers were fucking trash in the 50s. Dumb tech enthusiasts all said the same shit people say about AI today: computers are unreliable, create more problems than they solve, are ham-fisted solutions to problems that require human interaction, etc. here are the HUGE problems computers had that we solved before the 70s.
Problem: No standard way to represent negative numbers in binary.
Solution: Two’s complement became the standard.
Problem: Bit errors from unreliable hardware.
Solution: Hamming codes, CRC, and other ECC methods.
Problem: Inconsistent and error-prone real number math.
Solution: IEEE 754 standardized floating-point formats and behavior.
Problem: Each computer had its own incompatible instruction set.
Solution: Standardized ISAs like x86 and ARM became dominant.
Problem: Memory was slow, small, and expensive.
Solution: Virtual memory, caching, and paging systems.
Problem: Basic operations like sorting were inefficient.
Solution: Research produced efficient algorithms (e.g., Quicksort, Dijkstra’s).
Problem: No formal approach to designing logic circuits.
Solution: Boolean algebra, Karnaugh maps, and FSMs standardized design.
Problem: Programs used unstructured jumps and were hard to follow.
Solution: Structured programming and control constructs (if, while, etc.).
Problem: No standard way to represent letters or symbols.
Solution: ASCII and later Unicode standardized text encoding.
Problem: Code was written in raw machine or assembly code.
Solution: High-level languages and compilers made programming more accessible.
Its just ignorant to be acting like any of the problems we face with AI won’t be sorted just as they were with computers.
No it is literally determined by clearance level. It is mandated.
You’re not wrong today. But this is exactly the basis of the critique of computers in the 50s. And you probably created this post using a mobile Internet connected computer that fits in your pocket.
My routine colonoscopy was over $1000 and insurance covered alllll but $300.
You spelled ‘not having slaves’ kinda funny there.
Yep.
I use pass phrases filtered through a mess of cyber chef.
Depends on your clearance level/what you have access to.
Its almost like they’re aren’t actually any Boogeymen.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twist%2Fturn the knife (in the wound)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/twist-turn-the-knife-in-the-wound
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/twist_the_knife
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/twist-the-knife
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/twist+the+knife
Literally every dictionary recognizes the idiom.
Maybe read more?
Where did I say incels are violent, exactly?
I said this will hurt their feelings more than they’re already hurt. I didn’t say they would be violent in response to that.
Oh man this is gonna twist so many incel knives.
Imagine having a crush on some girl, making a move, feeling like it might’ve gone ok, and then you see her and that dude you hate are in the same location, at his place, at 330 am.
Leave it to mechahitler to weed out the hate, amirite?
That really has nothing to do with the fact that immigration court is, as I said, court.
And meeting minutes are logged and FOIA-able.
Not sure what you’re going on about.
China, if you’re listening…
Immigration court is court.
Lots of questions. Any of which I could only provide a very opinionated answer on. But to answer the bulk of your response here, I think we look to sociologists to predict the future of AI integrating into the division of labor.
Basically, the division of labor will become more organic and complex, less rigid and mechanical.
(i.e. nobody was paying bills by walking the neighborhood dogs in 1920. As technology increases, the division of labor becomes more organic/less mechanical.)
So with this Is say that “Software Developer” is not a job in the future, but that statement carries more weight than it should. The software developer of today will be invaluable as a technician working with AI. In this example “software developer” is a mechanical division of labor where something in the future might be like “Development Strategist” as a more organic division of labor. As to what that looks like, your guess is as good as mine.