Summary

Lawyers for Elon Musk’s America PAC acknowledged in court that $1 million-a-day “winners” in its voting sweepstakes aren’t randomly selected but are chosen as paid “spokespeople.”

The Philadelphia hearing saw DA Larry Krasner argue the sweepstakes is an illegal lottery lacking clear rules or privacy protections. Intended to boost Trump’s campaign in swing states, the initiative faces scrutiny for alleged data misuse.

Musk’s involvement as the PAC’s figurehead could lead to criminal charges as Pennsylvania, an important battleground state, nears Election Day.

  • Lexam
    link
    10617 days ago

    Holy shit. Having the balls to admit in court that your sweepstakes is fraudulent! That’s a special kind of special.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Some people were calling this the day he announced it. That it would turn out they weren’t random, thus not an illegal lottery.

    He’s not half a sixtheenth as clever as he thinks he is.

      • @humorlessrepost
        link
        English
        717 days ago

        IANAL, but would anyone have standing to sue if there aren’t any losses? It’s not like people bought tickets.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1217 days ago

          I mean that’s still time and effort to do whatever form was necessary to “apply”. It also probably runs foul of lottery rules to have not randomly picked winners because everyone else didn’t have a chance of winning. Like if someone “in the know” adulterates the powerball numbers the fact that everyone else was statistically unlikely to win doesn’t change that they lied about the chance to win.

  • @lemmylommy
    link
    4017 days ago

    Your honor, it’s not a lottery, it’s just a scam.

  • @LEDZeppelin
    link
    English
    3417 days ago

    So you lied to Pa voters that it was a lottery

  • @ulkesh
    link
    2817 days ago

    Illegal lottery in Pennsylvania, okay.

    But how does this not also violate FEC regulations and, you know, US law? He’s literally paying people to vote and the implication is to vote for his specific candidate.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      1717 days ago

      “When you’re rich, they let you do it.”