To win working-class voters — and possibly today’s election — Democrats need to attack economic elites. But the Kamala Harris campaign hasn’t consistently offered an anti-elite counter to Donald Trump’s right-wing populism.
  • @TropicalDingdong
    1•5 hours ago

    Lemmings when given evidence that their preferred political actor could be doing better:

    • Eugene V. Debs' GhostEnglish
      3•4 hours ago

      Sticking your head in the sand and downvoting whatever you disagree with is how you make good policies and candidates, right?

      If she wins today, that’s good. If she loses, I have to laugh because I’ll cry that it could have been prevented but choose to ignore it.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•4 hours ago

        Not by her though. It’s the risk of running a candidate that’s part of a current administration. They can’t even pretend to promise they’ll make radical changes; they have to align with the current policy position.

        • @draneceusrex
          2•2 hours ago

          That was her choice though. But some of those same breaks could have potentially hurt her Never Trump coalition. She made some space with Biden during her Elipse speech, but that was a bit late. That was probably her one misstep in the campaign. Regardless, the day isn’t over, very few counts are in. I think she did well in her campaign all things considered.

  • Eugene V. Debs' GhostEnglish
    -1•28 minutes ago

    Downvotes are how you engage with criticism and reflections, right?

    EDIT: Ooo, thank you for engaging with my points and reflecting all of this. Good stuff.