Like, no seriously, the state department classified him as a terrorist until like 10 years before he died. He was already a beloved figure In his modern incarnation as we remember him now way, Way way before The US federal government ever accepted that he had actually just won and was not a terrorist anymore, but a statesman.

  • @aaa999
    link
    19 hours ago

    caitlyn johnstone

  • ceoofanarchism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    921 hours ago

    Unpopular take but I think both Nelson Mandela was a terrorist and that terrorism isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      620 hours ago

      Yeah terrorism comes in many shapes and sizes. And recently there is a trend in calling anything that targets the interests of rich people terrorism.

      Terrorism against private jets = cool and trendy

      Terrorism against random people in public = very unfriendly

  • go $fsck yourself
    link
    English
    721 hours ago

    Did you have to post a full uncropped phone-length screenshot of a poor quality of this instead of spending literally a few seconds to find a better quality version?

    • @alphanerd4OPM
      link
      -419 hours ago

      Well no, it saved less than a minute, and ya I agree that would usually mean less engagement, but fascinatingly by pointing it out and making that criticism real it adds complexity to the post and actually increases engagement.

      • go $fsck yourself
        link
        English
        418 hours ago

        Are you a YouTube algorithm? Why does “increasing engagement” matter more to you than the quality of the content you share?

  • Clay_pidgin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    824 hours ago

    Freedom fighter/terrorist dichotomy aside, he definitely used terror to achieve political goals. We look upon him kindly because his cause seems just to us, and because he won.