• @MacGuffin94
    link
    English
    383 days ago

    I mean, it’s not like things have gotten better.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    243 days ago

    Cheaper than a therapist that everyone is always advising to broke ass folks around reddit lol

        • @Nurse_Robot
          link
          English
          63 days ago

          Or into difficult to manage chronic problems later in life. It’s a spectrum, like everything

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Slippery slope to a poisoned nation, with a long tail of carnage and collateral damage. I can understand the motivation to indulge though.

  • @moistclump
    link
    English
    93 days ago

    Ok so the article is from 2024 but seems to be referencing up to 2022. That’s quite a reporting delay. Also does anyone have access to the full article?

    I guess the concerning part is that it’s sticking around longer than from other mass trauma events:

    “People assumed this was caused by acute stress, like what we saw with 9/11 and Katrina, and typically it goes back to normal after these stressful events are over,” he added. “But that’s not what we’re seeing.”

    I know I went from barely drinking to almost a bottle of wine a night. I had to make a lot of life changes to bring it back down, it was very bad.

  • Noble Shift
    link
    English
    53 days ago

    Technically speaking alcohol is a solution. And everybody knows the best kind of correct is technically.

  • @Eheran
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You mean “they still do”? Because obviously they, we, still are… minus those that died since and plus those that were born.

    • @tuck182
      link
      English
      23 days ago

      Right or wrong, I believe the intended message was, “[They] began drinking more. They still are (drinking more).”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      “They” in this sentence denotes Americans collectively, not just Americans who drink. Although yes, in actual fact outside the world of grammar, it’s only the alcohol-drinking Americans who are consuming more alcohol, the sentence doesn’t break “Americans” into subgroups in the way that your sentence implies.