• Boxscape
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1007 days ago

    In a bit of malicious compliance, Vivendi turned over millions of pages of Korean language documents from its local subsidiary during the discovery phase of Valve’s cybercafe lawsuit, with anything potentially useful to Valve buried under both the volume of material and a language barrier. Quackenbush turned to a summer intern identified only as “Andrew” in the documentary. A native Korean speaker who also majored in Korean language studies in college, Andrew found the needle in the haystack: An email where one Korean Vivendi executive discussed the destruction of documents related to the Valve case to their superior, with the implication that the more junior executive was ordered to do so. With this evidence in hand, Valve was able to turn the tables on Vivendi, securing a highly favorable settlement and full ownership of its IP moving forward.

    It’s not clear to me how the email described was helpful though?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1277 days ago

      Destroying evidence is a big no-no in a legal case, and would allow the judge to draw a negative inference, so I’m guessing that gave Valve the leverage to settle the case.

      • Boxscape
        link
        fedilink
        English
        197 days ago

        Destroying evidence is a big no-no in a legal case, and would allow the judge to draw a negative inference, so I’m guessing that gave Valve the leverage to settle the case.

        Ah, that would make sense. So Valve probably won more on procedural grounds then?

        “Needle in a haystack” made me assume it was something like actual contractual language forbidding Vivendi from doing what it was trying to do.

        • @thedirtyknapkin
          link
          English
          567 days ago

          i mean, destroying evidence related to the case is a little more than a “procedural violation”. that’s clear cut obstruction and it’s a felony crime.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          30
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I mean, they settled as soon as they found this, as they knew how it would’ve played out in a trial. If you can show a judge that evidence was deleted, the judge/jury would need to assume that the missing evidence would show the guilt of that party.

          The needle in the haystack part was that Vivendi were trying to bury Valve in evidence, as they assumed that they wouldn’t be able to afford to hire a bunch of Korean paralegals to go through everything. A wealthy opponent will do that in order to put you in the position where you have to choose between settling or paying a fortune to go through the evidence that may or may not contain anything useful.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          227 days ago

          If I’m reading this correctly, the haystack is the malicious compliance of providing all documents printed and in Korean. The needle is the document that snuck between other documents so that Valve attorneys wouldn’t find it.

        • subignition
          link
          fedilink
          217 days ago

          Sort of procedural, yes - if you are alleging something and the evidence that would support that was destroyed by the other party, the court can make an adverse inference which basically means the court assumes the destroyed evidence would have proved your point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 days ago

          (I am not a lawyer)

          To me this is what allowed them to not comb through the millions of documents. Since you have a piece of evidence they gave you admitting to destroying additional evidence, they basically can get not goodwill at all in front of a judge, so it doesn’t matter if they say “your honor everything was turned over during discovery and we’re all clear”, the instant your lawyers contact their lawyers, it’s settling time.

  • @fluxion
    link
    English
    767 days ago

    Vivendi were complete pricks. They knew they were breaking the law the entire time and still tried to tank Valve, their own asset, instead of just stopping it.

    That intern was the hero we needed 🫡

  • @DandomRude
    link
    English
    357 days ago

    A nice story. I just find it a bit odd that the article says nothing about what became of “Andrew”, the summer intern, whether Valve paid him an appropriate bonus or offered him a job later on.

      • @DandomRude
        link
        English
        167 days ago

        Perhaps they nicknamed him “the giant” for his trouble tho

    • @ripcord
      link
      English
      116 days ago

      It seems like an article written purely about info in a documentary, with no original investigation (although I could easily see that they tried at least some, but no one answered)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Why doesn’t it surprise me that they end up paving the way for Activision Blizzard… “On 2 December 2007, Vivendi announced that it would be merging its game publishing unit with Activision in a $18.8 billion deal. This will allow the merged company, Activision Blizzard, to rival Electronic Arts, the world’s biggest video game publisher.” Cited from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivendi Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7123582.stm https://www.reuters.com/article/us-activision-vivendi-idUSN0236714920071202/

  • @sir_pronoun
    link
    English
    77 days ago

    I think we should petition Valve to award that intern Andrew something big, like a million bucks or so, if that hasn’t happened yet! They might just be cool enough to go with it!