• TimeSquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Haha, there’s still things embedded deep in code and in CPUs that go way back to the 80s. If only y’all knew. It’s all shit built on top of older shit, built on top of even older shit with kludges and hacks to glue it all together. Know why Windows has five different ways to access the same setting? Because if they get rid of the older methods, they break a ton of other shit that depends on it too. A house of cards or a Jenga tower.

    A modern PC can STILL natively boot a DOS floppy from 1986 in legacy BIOS mode because of this.

    Theres also examples in the corporate world where some companies are STILL running 70s mainframes, and use shiny new PCs as front end terminals that just connect to the same old backend.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Windows 2000 was definitely peak, for its time.

            but Windows 7 eclipsed it, and remains the best microsoft OS… I will fight and die on this hill <3

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Seriously, each new windows update just adds a fresh new coat of paint on top, as if to make finding the actually useful win 7 and xp menus, that are still there, harder.

        Linux Mint feels to me like what windows 10/11 should’ve been

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      This is super interesting and I had NO IDEA! Makes me very curious how much more efficient an entire fresh start might be with new tech.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I can’t even think of any recent CPUs that aren’t based on previous designs. Even Apple’s new M1 is an ARM derivative, which itself is based on an ancient computer from the 80s known as the “Acorn”.

        It’s a bit poetic. They were directly competing with Apple at the time, and Acorn named themselves such so that they would appear in front of Apple in the phone book. Of course, they haven’t existed in a long time, but 35-40 years later, Apple decides to use the great-grandson of Acorn’s CPU in their new products.

  • Justas🇱🇹
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    Never name anything with “New” in the name, it will look silly after a few years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Yeah, new technology because it was the file system for Windows NT, which originally stood for… Windows New Technology.

    Later Microsoft decided to just use NT as a moniker without any indication of it’s origins.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    51 year ago

    Neanderthal Technology File System

  • @zxqwas
    link
    51 year ago

    The guy in charge of thinking of a new acronym probably retired 10 years ago.

    • @silverwing
      link
      41 year ago

      Apparently Microsoft is going to move win 11 to refs but idk when. For all we know it might be in windows 12 only

      • @Sipuloija
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Wasn’t that supposed to be come out with Longhorn? Wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for it.

    • @joneskind
      link
      11 year ago

      Or APFS

      It’s open source too

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why didn’t they still not roll it out for general userbase?

        Edit: Confused it with Microsofts new fs.

        • @joneskind
          link
          21 year ago

          They did.

          It’s up to OS developers to implement it or not on their OSes

          I use libsfapfs on Linux, but as always when Apple does anything open source, the Linux community hates it

          Darwin WebKit Swift and its compiler APFS ALAC …

          The only widely used open source project from Apple that I know is CUPS

          The only things in macOS that are not open source are related to its GUI.

          But you know… Apple bad as usual

          As a developer, most of Linux users I know develop in Java and dual-boot on Windows to play games.

      • TOR-anon1
        link
        11 year ago

        What?

        I’m sure it’s still proprietary.

        APFS, right?

        • @joneskind
          link
          11 year ago

          You’re right.

          That’s weird because I still remember the keynote where it was announced and I use an OS lib on Linux that I was sure was maintained by Apple.

  • @Imgonnatrythis
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s still way better than Fat, but incredibly incompatible with a lot of things still and new usb drives are always FAT. Shame ntfs didn’t catch on more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      External storage is always FAT, because everything can read FAT, so it just makes life easier for file transfers.

      Not because NTFS/ext4/etc doesnt work on usb sticks.

      • @Imgonnatrythis
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Yeah, but that’s the shame. Ntfs been around for decades, would be great for usb as it allows faster transfer speeds and more secure. Would have been nice if more devices included it so it wasn’t such a compatibility barrier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          I’d rather have universal compatibility myself.

          besides, its not like you cant reformat it to NTFS. They just come stock as fat so you can access them on any device.