Debate An Atheist - Lemmy.ca
lemmy.ca
A place for theists to come and debate atheists. Atheism, for the purposes of this community, is defined as lack of belief in deities (as opposed to belief in a lack of deities or other definitions). Rules: - Absolute requirement on respectful discourse. - No downvoting for disagreement or poor arguments! Use downvotes only for egregious breaking of rules and for disrespectful or off-topic discourse. - No spamming or advertising. - No trolling. - No NSFW. - No low effort posts or top level replies. - Posts must be on topic and present a debate or discussion topic with explanation / support. Link dropping (a link with no explanation or summary) won’t be allowed. Links that support an argument are fine. - No bigotry, sexism, homophobia, racism, etc.

We say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence but I am betting you could create ordinary claims about the supernatural that require extraordinary evidence.

Example: the deist god could make a four sided triangle.

  • @HypersapienEnglish
    2•2 years ago

    Any claim that asserts that the supernatural exists is automatically extraordinary, since there has never been any evidence that the supernatural exists. It assumes an entirely new component to the universe.

  • ZambonimanMEnglish
    1•2 years ago

    Hi, thanks for posting.

    We say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence but I am betting you could create ordinary claims about the supernatural that require extraordinary evidence.

    Example: the deist god could make a four sided triangle.

    Interesting.

    The way I see this is that is both extraordinary and a non-sequitur, since a triangle can’t have four sides by definition. So, once the purported deity made it have four sides it simply wouldn’t be a triangle anymore by definition.