i like rhythmbox a lot and it’s so great to use it as a music player but most of my music files don’t even have any metadata it’s just “song-name-author.opus” so it’s a lot for me which is why i would use vlc instead yea!!! but anyway ummm why does xfce or gnome use rhythmbox??

  • Dr. Wesker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 month ago

    most of my music files don’t even have any metadata

    How can you live that way?

      • Dr. Wesker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s fair. Though “simple” for me is actually having meticulously sorted and tagged media. That way it displays reliably and beautifully in most any player.

  • @BananaTrifleViolin
    link
    English
    101 month ago

    Probably because it’s long standing and fully featured. It’s been going since 2001 after all.

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    If you want useless default apps, look no further than the Gnome Terminal.

      • @porl
        link
        English
        129 days ago

        Nothing wrong with it. I use kitty these days but when I used gnome I had no problem with gnome terminal for one off jobs and some variation of the quake terminal type apps for things I wanted to be ongoing in the background. My usage style has changed a lot since then but I’d happily use it again if I went back.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Uh, what was it in Artix again? One of the tools i usually uninstall on initial setup since i use mpv for music.

    Btw, could you guys please stop shipping xfburn with the distro? Optical media gets rare nowadays.