just for context, i’ve been daily driving this thinkpad z61m with windows vista sp2 for the past week and it’s actually been pretty damn good lol. sorry, i just don’t like linux that much. though i might post haiku in the future :3 also it’s dual booted with XP Pro SP3 :p

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      this one? sure, it’s a ThinkPad Z61m, TYPE 9450-D9U blah blah blah

      Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, 2GB DDR2, 500GB 7200RPM HDD (came with 120GB 5400RPM), 1680x1050 LCD, 9-cell battery (with about 60% capacity), and 0.3mp webcam

      • cowboycrustation [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 hours ago

        Did you upgrade any of it or was that how it came out of the box? I like the look of it and the old thinkpad keyboards

        • rowan :3OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 hours ago

          no upgrades other than the hard drive, it didn’t come with one though. although this is just about the max config of this that you could’ve gotten in 2006 afaik.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 days ago

    Vista was fine. It got a bad rep because it introduced a lot of changes that are normal now, like UAC. It took a bullet for 7.

      • rowan :3OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 day ago

        the main change was that it came out in an era of faster computers lol

          • rowan :3OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 day ago

            that was definitely more of an early 2006 thing, Windows Vista came out in late 06 for manufacturers, but I think it was definitely relevant at the time

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      i’d say it was more because the hardware requirements lol, if it came out in, say, 2008, I feel like people would’ve already had better computers and it would’ve been better received. that being said, it’ll be fine on high end hardware as far back as 2004 I believe

  • @BananaTrifleViolin
    link
    English
    62 days ago

    I guess each to their own, but Vista End-of-life was 2017, and windows remains the main target for malware and viruses as it has the biggest market share. If it’s just a side project then fair enough, but if it’s your main daily driver then it’s a bit of a risk to take tbh.

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      photoshop hehe

      it doesnt run on linux :(

          • macniel
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            Yeah it sure is and everyone who says it’s a good replacement for photoshop is delusional. A more fitting replacement would be Krita.

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Not sure what you mean. Most functions are available, except for AI enhanced functions of Photoshop. The UI is ultimately based on older versions of Photoshop. There will be some (potentially minor) learning curve to get away from the corpo option.

            It’s pretty straightforward. But support for Adobe seems hard to break.

            If you support AI art, then yeah, definitely stick with Adobe, if GIMP is too much of an ask. Ultimately FOSS relies on people using it.

            And, given the sub/community you have posted this in, maybe reevaluate your needs.

            • rowan :3OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              yeah that’s fair, and I don’t really mean the UI layout or anything, that’s fine. I’m talking about the fact that everything feels buggy and slow, like it’ll crash at any minute. I can’t stand it. if you like using it, that’s great, i just can’t.

              also I use a pirated copy of CS6

              • circuitfarmer
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Well tbh, I don’t know the state of GIMP on Windows, but it definitely isn’t designed for it. It should not be buggy or crashy – at least it isnt on Linux. So I mean… Why Windows?

                CS6 definitely runs on Linux via Wine. I’ve done through CS8. But again… There is little reason to do so assuming you’re running GIMP on the intended platform.

                Edit: not trying to be a dick either. Mostly just trying to nudge you to give both Linux and GIMP another chance. DM me if you want, happy to help.

                • rowan :3OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 day ago

                  i’ve run GIMP on Windows, Linux, Haiku even, felt the same either way. so like at this point I just don’t care. and plus I use content aware fill, like, a lot. will not be using WINE, too much of a headache/

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 day ago

      running Haiku on my T410 but yea I tried that, couldn’t get school WiFi to work :\

  • @ExhaleSmile
    link
    22 days ago

    Slightly disappointed it’s not Windows Me…

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      11 day ago

      2K is better. 2K is the least bullshit Windows. Also its icons and general appearance are not exactly the same as 9x, somewhat modernized, but still that pixel design.

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 day ago

      ahh i don’t have anything old enough for Windows Me :(

      • rowan :3OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 day ago

        actually this thing is dual booted with XP Pro SP3 and Vista Home Premium SP2

    • rowan :3OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      true :p i love vista. it’s also dual booted with XP :)