• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    While cool application of the tevh, this is peak vertical video brainrot. Stop making vertical videos.

  • AZmaybe9
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    I’ll enjoy this the moment our eyes are built vertically.

  • @Mastens
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Saw the clips. Not impressed.

    Outside of it being a new clickbait trend the movies, the example they are using lose way more because they are totally changing the scene composition.

    Consider the attention to detail and visuals in Akira. If they expanded the visuals to be portrait oriented they wouldn’t have such drab, empty, uninspired art in the added space. Which is exactly what AI does in this instance. It makes the examples (Akira especially) look less compelling, less focused, and in the event it does have something decently render takes away from the true composition of the shit so it ruins the content of said shot.

    My two cents.

  • @getseclectic
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    This is cool as a proof of concept but I tend to agree with the ‘dissenters’ that the composition is much stronger in many of the unaltered scenes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Actually super well done and an interesting concept.

    These are all static shots from the film that suit the format and method well, so definitely could not do the whole film like this.

    I think it looks neat, it’s not viable for a whole movie, but it’s cool!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love when AI is used to give us different perspectives, belying the impact to artist’s original intent. More of a curiosity in this case, a “what if?” Of sorts

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      I hate it too but there’s a reason books have a portrait resolution, it’s easier to scan when you’re holding it in front of your face

      • Poggervania
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        My guy, books were portrait-oriented because you can get more words on paper that way. They were literally made before phones were even a thing.

      • ᕮᐯIᒪ Tᕼᕮ ᑕᗩT
        link
        English
        -151 year ago

        takes a deep breath

        Okay, let’s do an autopsy of your reply:

        1. Books don’t have a resolution. They’re paper.

        2. “Portrait” is an orientation, not a resolution.

        3. Movies aren’t books.