• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 days ago

    Wehay! \o/

    the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) said removing the deadline would mean claims would “continue to disrupt many farm businesses for years to come”

    My heart bleeds for the poor businesses having to be patient while councils take the time to properly record human beings’ ancient rights to walk over land.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      “continue to disrupt many farm businesses for years to come”

      Or they could you know.

      Assume the right of way exists and plan to work within it.

      If the potential of it being a righr of way is effecting them in any way. Then they must know where ir is being debated.

      If they are choosing to fight it. The doubt is entirly their creation.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      I wish the NFU would decide what the hell their priorities are and then stick to them for 5 minutes. They seem to swing wildly from issue to issue, without ever really improving things for farmers.

      I grew up on a farm and we had some tracks through our fields, it was a total non issue as long as people kept dogs on leads. One time we had a helicopter land in one of our fields and even that wasn’t a problem, everything sprung back up after a while. Although immediately afterwards everything did kind of look like a mini nuke had gone off.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 days ago

      Our stalwart guardians of the land right there, we make them work so hard for their tax free inheritance

  • @UncleArthur
    link
    English
    332 days ago

    Won’t somebody think of all the wealthy landowners, having to put up with being treated like ordinary people?

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      82 days ago

      I mean, that’s kind of standard procedure in the UK, innit?

      • @UncleArthur
        link
        English
        62 days ago

        It certainly was over the past 14 years, yes.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          I was thinking more about the whole monarchy thing, going back to … forever?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 days ago

    You guys should get a right of way law.

    We don’t have public paths like that because you are allowed to walk wherever you want except very close to people’s homes and in people’s gardens.

    You are even allowed to walk across grazing fields actively being roamed by farm animals. You obviously have to close the gate behind you though.

  • Alex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 days ago

    While I’ve been updating open street map I’ve also taken the time to report right off way violations via my councils web portal. The problem is most of the paths around here are permissive national park paths and there is no canonical catalog available digitally to cross check against. I don’t know if they should also be registered as a right of way?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      If in doubt, I’d say register them. It’ll be investigated then and them added to the digital register they’re creating if it is supposed to be a public path, and if not, at least someone notified them to look into it. If nobody tells them then it’s at risk of losing public access.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There’s a public access right of right by a property owned by one of the Trump’s around me. I’ve made extra sure to register it just to irritate them.

        Next time I walk past it I must remember to take a picture, because it is quite spectacularly tasteless.