• Skeezix
    link
    English
    477 days ago

    Seems to me that the supreme court shouldnt be able to be “urged” to rule the wants of an executive

  • @Tyfud
    link
    English
    13
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    President Trump alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government—concerns which President Trump himself has acknowledged,

    What an absolute load of hot garbage. Electoral Mandate? Fuck right off.

    • @ovalofsand
      link
      English
      56 days ago

      It’s sad that most people don’t know that a plurality isn’t the same thing as a majority

  • OhStopYellingAtMe
    link
    107 days ago

    Weird to see trump and the ACLU on the same side for a change.

    • @Doomsider
      link
      136 days ago

      ACLU is against it due to principals of freedom of speech not that TikTok is some worthwhile company.

      Trump is against it because he wants a big bribe for them to continue to operate. He has always been a blackmail king so this is right up his alley.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 days ago

      It’s like RFK trying to ban medical commercials. I agree with him under this one circumstance, but for entirely different reasons lol.

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      717 days ago

      Yeah, but didn’t he recently meet with the owners of tick tock? I’m sure some money greased his slimy brain

      • @jeffwM
        link
        557 days ago

        YASS he sure did meet with one of the owners

        Jeffrey Yass, it was Jeffrey Yass, some billionaire investor who just so happened to be a big campaign donor

        • @fluxion
          link
          English
          107 days ago

          Grifters gonna grift