- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Summary
Some U.S. newspapers are adopting “clean slate” programs to remove or edit old crime stories, aiming to reduce barriers for people who have moved on from minor offenses.
Inspired by the harmful effects of searchable archives, newsrooms like The Oregonian and Cleveland.com consider requests to delete names, mugshots, or entire articles.
Critics argue these stories perpetuate stigma, while advocates see the programs as tools for fairness and rehabilitation.
Newsrooms are also rethinking current crime coverage to minimize long-term harm and prioritize ethical reporting.
Good.
If there’s a safety reason you need to know about someone’s history there are systems in place - it’s unnecessary to perpetuate someone’s punishment by forever marking them in casual searches.
Personally I would prefer a society were people knowing it did not cause continued punishment.
So would I - but that’s not the society we live in.
“The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.”
~ John GilmoreIt’s extremely difficult to actually expunge information from the public internet, for both good and ill.
The internet archive is a thing tho. Once its on the internet, consider it forever.
I heard about this several years ago on an episode of Radiolab. It’s a really good one.