…he would though, wouldn’t he?
Well he’s hardly going to come out and say the allegations are true.
You shouldn’t judge other people by your own standards.
Ok Sam
Meh.
Call me a cynic but this snacks of a dispute over money rather than a case of sexual abuse and whilst I understand it’s popular to dogpile on AI and cunt CEOs, the principle of innocent until proven guilty should always remain.
This hardly sounds like a dispute over money considering she’s been accusing him for years and I think there are better ways to haggle family over money other than literally accusing your own brother of raping you for 6 years straight. Jfc.
That tracks.
What does? “aI bAd” or “woman waits for man to be incredibly successful before making allegations of sexual abuse that ended in 2006”?
Just took the offended shotgun approach there didn’t we?
It tracks that a CEO is a maladjusted creep.
Normally I’m very strongly on the side of “wait and see”. I’m quite inclined to make a conscious exception for this jamoke.
