• @TenderfootGungi
      link
      41 year ago

      Agree, title does not make sense. It supposedly uses a periscope lens. Is that an inch long? Is the cutout a full inch?

    • @SnowGlobal
      link
      31 year ago

      I wonder if they mean that it expanded by a square inch of area

  • @mr_tyler_durden
    link
    161 year ago

    People get work up about this but we’ve already crossed the rubicon once the bump was large enough that it couldn’t sit “flat”, even with a case. At this point I don’t care, take up the whole back of the phone if you want.

    The bump annoyed me when it was first announced but I’ll choose better pictures over caring about the bump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      No. I don’t care about it sitting flat, it’s more that these designs just assume you’ll throw a case on it. The bump hasn’t stopped being annoying at any point. Bigger is not going to be better, it’s just going to exaggerate this problem.

      • @Dark_Blade
        link
        21 year ago

        Yeah, what annoys me is that phones these days are designed to sit in cases that the manufacturer doesn’t even provide. Makes the device feel…incomplete, somehow.

    • @TheTechNerdOP
      link
      111 year ago

      It is a camera that has a phone attached to it

  • @KryptonDeer
    link
    31 year ago

    For me, the phone experience will always come first before camera quality since even mid-range phones produce respectable pictures these days.

    I will not purchase a 6.7"+ phone with huge camera bump that can’t sit flat on table. Last week I tried my friend’s Xiaomi 13 Ultra and that camera bump was eating into my hand…

    • @Stovetop
      link
      21 year ago

      Like it as not, however, camera quality is a huge selling point for a lot of people in the market for a new phone, and it’s one of the few “measurable gains” that can still be shown off with each upgrade cycle now that most other smartphone features have capped out or gotten a lot more incremental.

  • @FiendishFork
    link
    21 year ago

    I like Googles design language for their pixels, instead of a giant bump they made it into a visor.

    • @Dark_Blade
      link
      11 year ago

      Apple does this to keep the lenses equidistant and close together, I assume. It definitely looks ugly, but it’s a usability compromise that had to be made.

  • @tahoe
    link
    01 year ago

    And yet photos will still look just as over processed, if not more.

      • @tahoe
        link
        01 year ago

        I highly doubt it considering the whole industry is doing it (although iPhones are way worse than some others), but I’d like to be surprised

      • @Nogami
        link
        -101 year ago

        Certainly hope so. Images from my iPhone 10 were superior to my 13PM. Too much sharpening. I’m sure some people like sharp and de-noised but it looks quite artificial to me.

        Just make it an option to configure. I prefer a bit of grain and softness over artificially sharp.