• kamenLady.
    link
    40
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Gaiman didn’t believe in foreplay or lubrication, Stout tells me, which could make sex particularly painful. There was no “safe word”, nor “aftercare” or “limits”.

    Fuck

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    171 day ago

    Wow that was quite a read.

    Absolutely brutish for Gaiman and Palmer to take advantage of vulnerable people like that.

    Disgusting.

  • @Blue_Morpho
    link
    5
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Archived link you posted says “not found (yet?)”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -632 days ago

    If you didn’t twig that something was up when he had a writer lock a Muse in a rape room in Sandman I don’t know what to tell you.

    Like, it’s not proof or anything, but anyone that doesn’t at least ask themselves some questions after that is simply not sufficiently skeptical of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      892 days ago

      What?? Are you saying a writer who writes about crazy shit is guilty of doing or wanting to do those crazy things?

      If that’s what you’re saying, that is absolutely insane.

      How sad would the world be if writers couldn’t put down whatever comes up in their minds. How boring and stilted every book would be if writers had to constantly worry about what people would think about their writing.

      • @idiomaddict
        link
        217 hours ago

        Of course they can and should write whatever inspires them, but ever since Louis CK, it makes me wonder if they’re writing about feelings they struggle with.

        • 🔍🦘🛎
          link
          English
          422 days ago

          A guy rode a dragon.

          Only the mind of an actual dragon rider could write that sentence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -492 days ago

            You don’t even know what my user name is, maybe stay out of discussions that require reading comprehension.

            • 🔍🦘🛎
              link
              English
              241 day ago

              I imagined that the wyvern was a dragon but the precise etymology is dubious at best, as some traditions would call it a drake or a wyrm.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -351 day ago

                Which are all dragons so it’s not vague at all. If you weren’t confusing me with that Drag guy based on your sentence choice I’ll retract my comment.

                • 🔍🦘🛎
                  link
                  English
                  261 day ago

                  What are you talking about? I’m refuting your assertion by providing a simple example. Look I understand the sentiment that only a deranged mind could create certain types of art, but your example is very flimsy. I interpreted his muse story to be like folklore; tragic and cautionary.

    • Stern
      link
      362 days ago

      Sometimes the catgirl is just a catgirl… and sometimes we get this weeks episode of the authors thinly veiled fetish.

      From my own life: I though Lovecraft was somewhat racist when I read his works, but figured it was a times thing, and maybe a bit him… then I read about his personal life and his cats name and was like, “oh ok thats my b there.”

      • @Taalen
        link
        317 hours ago

        Lovecraft was a flaming racist even by the standards of the time, but it doesn’t seem to have come out of malice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 day ago

        Lovecraft was terrified of anything that was slightly different from what he was, not just race, but hometown, school you went to, social status, whatnot. It’s so extreme it really can’t be explained with ideology or psychology, something must’ve been up with him in the biological sense, like genetically shot amygdala. It’s frankly a miracle the man was functional enough to write stories but that primordial terror he felt about just about anything other is also why his stories are so good. He knows what he’s talking about.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is a very lukewarm defense, but this subject is something of a trope that shows up in various artists’ works. On the top of my head, I can say that it is a subject in a short story by Yoshihiro Tatsumi, as well as in Osamu Tezuka’s “Ayako”, both published way before Gaiman’s “Sandman” story. So I personally do not attribute too much importance to his story. His actions speak for themselves.

      • Stern
        link
        222 days ago

        Aside from it being kinda tropey, can’t really say that every author is “practicing what they preach” so to speak. Stephen King had a child orgy scene in “It”, and lord knows all the other wacky shit he’s written about in the other 50+ books he’s put out in his career and he’s an entirely normal well adjusted dude from what I’ve seen. Similarly, Junji Ito is a buttercup IRL but reading some of his stuff you’d think he was a serial killer, or at least someone who should be heavily medicated.

        • @MutilationWave
          link
          8
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Stephen King is most certainly not a normal well adjusted dude. He has seemingly achieved this through great personal hardship. At one point he probably did more drugs in a month than I have in my entire life, and I love drugs.

          But yeah that fucked up bastard can write a child orgy scene without ever wanting to harm children.

          Edit- King has had to take over production on at least one if not more movies because the drugs were flying so hard. And he was a drug addict himself at the time! He’s amazing.