• @Red_October
    link
    111 day ago

    A case that exists only because the Right cares more about hurting the people they don’t like than they do about helping anyone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    524 hours ago

    Companies can’t have religious beliefs. Individuals within those companies can, but companies are not people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 hours ago

      Let’s go way further with that. Companies are not people. Companies do not have rights. Companies exist to serve the public good, otherwise their charter gets revoked

      That’s what companies were supposed to be, not unaligned AI running on distributed human hardware

  • Tedesche
    link
    English
    322 days ago

    In a court filing, Mitchell argued that requiring his clients to offer compulsory preventative care coverage “violates their religious beliefs by making them complicit in facilitating homosexual behavior, drug use, and sexual activity outside of marriage between one man and one woman.”

    Another example of the most religious Christians being the least Christ-like.

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There’s no hate like Christian love!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 day ago

    This is one of the many reasons people shouldn’t have to rely on their employer to buy their health insurance.

  • @Arbiter
    link
    111 day ago

    Oh boy, here comes another dogshit ruling from the madhouse.