• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 hours ago

    Yet another person to tag as a Zionist in Voyager, so I can downvote any comments of theirs I run across.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    There’s no “rule” against promoting genocide because it’s just common human decency that shouldn’t need a rule.

    It’s like making a rule against posting videos of yourself eating poop. Just don’t do it.

  • @lemonmelon
    link
    38 hours ago

    YDI for the reasons others have already listed, and also Y’dDI here for your efforts to rule lawyer after the fact.

  • @IndustryStandard
    link
    610 hours ago

    The ICJ has a reputation for its failures to stop past genocides and waiting until it does not matter anymore before they finally submit the judgement. Besides genocide denial you are factually incorrect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -2
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    PTB. Substantive discussions around the definition of genocide are not the same as Nazis saying the Holocaust never happened or whatever and I think it’s ridiculous to conflate those things. There is no rule that would cover this other than one against misinformation—but OP has not challenged the facts on the ground, just the way language is being used. Language is always going to be a subjective and arbitrary thing.

    That said, other things OP has said here might constitute misinformation so that makes me wonder if there is any missing context beyond this single comment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    261 day ago

    YDI.

    It’s genocide by any other definition. You can split hairs all you want and call it “crimes against humanity” or whatever, but it’s a distinction without much difference when we’re talking about targeted missile strikes upon schools, hospitals, and apartment buildings. Pedantry isn’t going to convey some nuance that people are missing, and the mods were right to put a stop to it.

    • Majorllama
      link
      11 day ago

      If making targeted strikes against specific structures is grounds for calling it a genocide then what does launching 10,000 unguided rockets randomly into who-knows-what in a single day count as?

      I hold the incredibly unpopular opinion that both sides have been absolutely terrible for a long time so don’t come at me for picking a side. I am genuinely curious if you consider both of those acts of aggression as a genocide or not based on your own listed definition.

      • @IndustryStandard
        link
        0
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        There were no targeted strikes. Biden told Israel to stop carpet bombing Gaza and Netanyahu’s defense was that he was doing a Dresden.

        What does launching 10,000 unguided rockets randomly into who-knows-what in a single day count as?

        There were no 10.000 rockets in a single day. It was like 2200 and most of them were simple distraction rockets.

        • Majorllama
          link
          19 hours ago

          My apologies. It was ~10,000 rockets including October 7th and up until now.

          However on October 7th specifically there are several reports putting the number around ~5,000 in a single day. All fired indiscriminately into primarily civilian areas.

          Yes they were “distraction” rockets to overwhelm the iron dome, but most of those continued into strike again civilians primarily.

          So if it’s a genocide when Israel is firing rockets into Gaza then why is it not a genocide when you reverse the roles?

          Logically they would either both considered attempted genocide or neither of them would be considered genocide.

          • @IndustryStandard
            link
            -1
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            This is how resistance from a concentration camp works. Hamas took great care to avoid child casualties. Israel takes great care to create child casualties.

            • Majorllama
              link
              17 hours ago

              “Hamas took great care to avoid child casualties”

              https://www.barrons.com/news/how-many-children-were-killed-in-hamas-s-october-7-attack-9c1d8239

              They shot one baby in the head along with their father inside of a bomb shelter.

              They burned another baby and two other kids along with their parents.

              They killed another 35 minors on October 7th alone.

              And before you even try to claim that news source is biased they are independently reviewed to be a “center” news source.

              I can openly admit that Israel has killed who even knows how many kids in Gaza since October 7th.

              The only difference is I find both sides here to be sick and evil. You seem to think only one side of this conflict has done anything wrong.

              • @IndustryStandard
                link
                0
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                Israel is confirmed to have killed at least 6 of the children you are mentioning so half your comment is discarded. The burnt children you are mentioning were confirmed killed by IDF tank fire.

                Your dramatization of a baby being shot while held by an IDF militant is not relevant either.

                Nonetheless even counting all the minors as killed by Hamas, it would constitute as 3% of the total Israeli deaths on 7 october.

                The children killed by Israel in Gaza constitute more than 40% of the total deaths.

                These numbers alone very clearly show who is targeting children and who is not.

                This is not taking into account Israel on average killed more children in Gaza every single day than the total amount killed on 7 october.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 day ago

      a distinction without much difference

      To you his might not matter. Words, especially legal terms under international law have actual definitions.

      If it doesn’t make a difference why ban people?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 day ago

        Because you’re playing pedant with people’s lives to stroke your own ego and/or prove that you’re the smartest one in the room. Meanwhile, people make those same arguments to try to discredit anyone who says the IDF and Netanyahu are killing civilians on purpose, that they’re killing women and children with abandon, that they’re committing war crimes like they’re going for the high score.

        Perhaps you don’t have malicious intent, but you should at least recognize that you sound like someone with an agenda and haven’t conveyed a take that they haven’t all made themselves before.

        In short, you sound like a shill for war crimes, whether you mean to or not, and you should reflect on why you feel it’s important to quibble about the difference between “crimes against humanity” and “genocide.” This is not an international courtroom.

  • @PugJesus
    link
    English
    341 day ago

    YDI, try not denying genocide

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -10
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s still an ongoing debate among experts if the war in Gaza can be considered a genocide or not. The ICJ hasn’t ruled on the case either.

      If one considers the war a genocide or not is still a political and legal argument at the moment. I am making such an argument in my OP. Suppressing political debate that doesn’t violate the rules is blatant powertripping to enforce a political agenda.

      Especially in the Israel/Palestine conflict, accusations of (slow motion) genocide have been leveled against Israel decades before the current Gaza war. I think in this case, it’s only used as a phrase to demonize Israel, not actually understand and describe the situation. The whole debate is part of the conflict in the information space.

      • db0M
        link
        fedilink
        31
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Don’t start making your case here or you’ll cop a ban here as well for going off-topic

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -141 day ago

          What rule am I violating? Why should arguing a case be off topic? Isn’t this what this community is supposedly about?

          From the sidebar

          Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

          The mod didn’t even make an argument that refers to a rule, that was supposedly broken.

          • db0M
            link
            fedilink
            28
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I don’t want to see you denyinggenocide here. You can argue whether you should gave been banned or not

      • db0M
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Going all “aaaaachsually…” about an ongoing genocide of which dozens of genocide experts have labeled as genocide, deserves what’s coming to you.

          • db0M
            link
            fedilink
            25
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Dozens of experts also denied smoking causes cancer or that climate change is happening. Last waning Btw. Take the genocide denial elsewhere

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              91 day ago

              For those of you who don’t know big tobacco pioneered this tactic in corporate context.

              Essentially, Israel is knows this is fucked but they also know they can buy off experts, and seed doubt within normie population who still view Israel in positive light. So they will keep doing these dilatory tricks until gen pop turns on them.

              By that time genocide will be done and they will play coy about

              Never gain, this time for real, trust me bro 🤡

              Further reading:

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Frank_Statement

              • sunzu2
                link
                fedilink
                121 day ago

                The discussion is here… You linking neo liberal fake news website from country that is enabling the genocide since early 20th century.

                Then you are telling me to go read this trash as some sort of flex?

                You gonna need to do better here and yojr behavior is starting to look like bad faith propaganda tactic.

                • db0M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  151 day ago

                  Don’t encourage them. This discussion thread ends here

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        141 day ago

        Denying genocide is rule breaking but I still don’t think censoring you is proper here.

        You should be able to express yourself and people should be able to have a discussion with you. Your arguments rely on assumptions about international order that don’t actually exist.

        Now that’s can’t happen which is lose lose.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -111 day ago

          Show me the rule. My whole argument is that, it’s not legally or scholarly settled if the war in Gaza is a genocide or not.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            71 day ago

            Go check the sub haha

            My whole argument is that, it’s not legally or scholarly settled if the war in Gaza is a genocide or not.

            That’s your opinion but in public eyes, this is settled as genocide. You should be able to disagree and argue your point and people should mock you.

            Also, you are going into genocide apologia territory now.

            I don’t need another man explaining to me:

            Well akshually, they only killed like 1% of the population they could do a lot more, so not a genocide.

            Israel is systematically displacing Palestinian population within Gaza and west bank. That’s a a hallmark of a genocide.

            But we not hear to argue that, I don’t think your opinion should be modded until you clear demonstrated bad faith intent. Which it seems like you would have tbh if given a chance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    YDI and I’m blocking you for being a genocide denier and an overall fucking moron based on numerous comments.

    Also I bet you’re a shit ass boyfriend why would anyone want to date a genocide denier.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -11 day ago

      My love life is great, thank you for your concern. I hope you find someone who loves you one day.

  • @surph_ninja
    link
    151 day ago

    This is disgusting hasbara. You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What you said was disgusting and abhorrent. It should have been removed.

    7 days is very lenient. Take it on the chin and reflect.