• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 day ago

    So I found this website that lists specific heat capacities for various foods, and while it doesn’t list “snacks”, dry foods values seem to range from 0.3 to 1 cal•g-1•K-1 = 0.0003 to 0.001 Cal•g-1•K-1. Assuming no phase change (i.e., melting) and otherwise temperature-invariant heat capacity, the energy required for heating a 100 g snack from freezer temps (-18 °C) to body temp (37 °C) is 1.65 to 5.5 Cal. More realistically, we can compare to eating an ambient-temp (20 °C) snack; that difference is only 1.1 to 3.8 Cal… in either case, the difference is negligible, generally < 1% of the calorie count of the snack itself.

  • @Deestan
    link
    113 days ago

    While strictly true (calories being a measure of energy and valid for both heat and fuel potential), the difference is - unsurprisingly - small :)

    Eating a large pizza (1200 kcal) straight from the freezer instead of heating it, gives you roughly 25 less kcal.

    • SaltyIceteaMaker
      link
      fedilink
      83 days ago

      well i mean, your body loses heat to the cold food, so i guess it’s technically correct?

      • मुक्त
        link
        fedilink
        113 days ago

        It is technically correct. A familiar analogy is that it is difficult to light up a fire in cold as the cold wood needs more heat.

        Whether it is significant or not is a different matter.