• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Anyone else remember when the Bush administration considered people who read Linux Journal to be targeted for extra surveillance because they labelled Linux Journal an extremist forum for merely discussing the existence of Tor and Tails?

    Pepperidge Farm 'members.

    Further, anyone else remember when the Bush admin pushed Total Information Awareness, a program that was collecting the kind of information on US citizens that those same citizens give away freely to Facebook without needing to be surveilled?

    We 'member that, too.

  • Eager Eagle
    link
    English
    753 days ago

    the real malware is facebook

  • a1studmuffin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    303 days ago

    So what’s going on here? Is this related to the new US administration? Or Microsoft and Meta exchanging money to silence the competition? Genuinely confused, but it seems fairly important whatever the motivations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      233 days ago

      Probably a little of all of the above.

      Folks that run OSs other than Windows and Mac are usually not passive sheep. If you want folks to just sit back and ignore what is going on you probably don’t want agitators in the mix.

    • beleza pura
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      maybe it’s the same reason some banks don’t work on rooted android phones: they want to prevent you to control how your system works bc they count on being able to extract as much information as possible from your computer usage without your consent

      • Mirror Giraffe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        There’s also the issue that some android and iOS features don’t work on rooted, like integrity check. We implemented it to prevent some malicious actors spamming our sms services, requiring them to use actual phones to access the service.

        In the end we went with a captcha because we didn’t want to exclude rooters but I can see it being a choice not all companies make.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    223 days ago

    been noticing this too in linux fb groups i am in. peoples’ posts linking distrowatch are getting banned.

  • @Godofdirt
    link
    133 days ago

    Just ban meta and x on the whole fucking site

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 days ago

    I reckon, given the extent of voluntary submission to constant surveilance from corporations and the continued march deeper into oligarchy, that it’s only a matter of time until platforms that aren’t explicitly anti-privacy are going to be reframed as extremist and dangerous as a part of the global political conversation. Perhaps this will end up being the leading edge of that.

    • Cousin Mose
      link
      fedilink
      103 days ago

      I already VPN 99% of my traffic out of the country and use non-US services wherever I can. When Trump was first elected I started wondering if they’re going to start a China-style firewall out of the country and it’s been in the back of my mind since.

  • @tekato
    link
    113 days ago

    Is there another example of this happening in Facebook aside for the openKylin post? I looked around and every article is only talking about this specific DistroWatch issue.

  • Crunk
    link
    English
    53 days ago

    I just tested it out. Nothing so far

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -213 days ago

    Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

    Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      63 days ago

      Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 days ago

        The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          -93 days ago

          You defending corpo censorship and also title has a question mark either way.

          If you didn’t mean to come off as bootlicker, then you need to work on that tone, “akshually”

          • Dave.
            link
            fedilink
            143 days ago

            “Akshually”, so do you. You had a chance to discuss and inform, and instead you went straight to “bootlicker”.

            Do you think they’re going to take any notice of whatever you say from here on?

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              -93 days ago

              I am not communicating to “them”

              I am making record of bootlicker behavior for other readers to correct me or to take notice.

              • Dave.
                link
                fedilink
                12 days ago

                Consider yourself corrected then. I’ve skimmed your comment history. Your go-to insult is “bootlicker” or alternatively, a simple clown emoji. In your comments you seem to provide very little context as to why you think that, it’s just, “I deem you to be a BOOTLICKER! Next!”

                So maybe a little guidance for you:

                The very, very, first thing you do when dealing with perceived propaganda - be it on mainstream media, online, or wherever - is to remove all the emotion and insults and see what’s left. You know what I see when I parse your comments like that? Very little.

                Thus I conclude you have nothing of importance to say, and you become background noise that gets tuned out.

                Actually your comments do have some small value. I check your bootlicker-comment-score and if it’s greater than 5, I know the community you posted in isn’t worth my time.