idk sounds kind of authorioritaritan, why not just confront them in the marketplace of ideas
You can’t sell asbestos cotton candy at a marketplace of food. Authorities of public health regulate that shit out of our markets. Same public health oversight but with regulatory baseball bats.
guess the
☭in my display name wasn’t enough to imply sarcasmDon’t you see? You just got HORSESHOE THEORY’D!!!
No I got it, I was just building on the joke by playing opposition to your sarcasm.
noooooooooooooooooooooooo I ruined it
I always like when people in our party are so invested in finding new ways to pwn the fascists in the marketplace of ideas. I’m sure the fascists are doing the same in their ‘self defence’ classes they are talking about.
those Nazis will surely realize that they’re being mean when confronted with poignant criticism
BASED
Based on what?!
yeah! 😁
Instilling fear on their opposition (violent nazi fascist) and providing safe spaces for immigrants (people of color)
Based!
Real Cognitive Dissonance here, I am faced with new evidence that the Fr*nch can be based /s
Omg I’m lemmygrad famous 😳
I must admit I’m not on this level of based, LUSINE was something else
Btw, what do fr*nch history class text books say about Algeria
Not a lot, colonial history is treated like a secondary subject, at least it was in my time, maybe it changed a bit now.
The war with Algeria is mostly discussed around the event of De Gaulle doing something with the radio when the fascist fringe of the military rebelled against him for having connected two neurons and abandonned the war. Very lame, no word about the atrocities.
Expected
I don’t know. Tell me
idk, I am asking them, I never cared to read a french text book
They say “Algeria good, France bad”. Happy?
You are not the person I asked
Looks like Double Dragon irl
Kind of makes me think of inglorious Basterds. I wonder if there’s any I inspiration taken from them.
OG FSU
Removed by mod
So, the brownshirts, but under a different flag, and different justification, but with equal fervor. Check.
And I suppose that the Allied soldiers were just the Wehrmacht but under a different flag too by your logic?
If Stalin just followed a debate class and invited Hitler for a heckin epic rap battle, he wouldn’t have had to send the Red Army in
I mean, Patton was in the Allies, and you know what he was like
While he’s fighting Nazis I couldn’t care less what he is like
You seem to equate all of the Wehrmacht (which mainly consisted of very young conscripts, many of them malleable, uneducated and never having come in actual contact with people outside of their direct environment) with the horrible atrocities a powerful elite amongst then chose to carry out. If you do, I pity you. If you don’t, you might see the nuance that discredits your own strawman fallacy.
Clean Wehrmacht believer has entered the chat.
Paradox of tolerance… or paradox of intolerance? Point is appeasement doesn’t work and at the end of the day you have to be intolerant of the intolerant.
Good point. But then again that’s also the point the other side uses.
It is unfortunately a valid point. If one side is acting to physically harm you then politely asking them to stop is no longer sufficient.
Former military, so can’t say I do not agree in principle. (Though not based on political stance.)
“former” war criminal, that explains it
By all means be my guest and debate the fascists and Nazis who want to eradicate entire races while I will try other ways to defend myself
Yeah I also believe that fascists and antifascists are morally equivalent. I am very smart.
Carry on with the ad hominem. Communism has killed more people than Nazism ever did, LOL.
Lol this guy still looks at surface level politics like a noob
