.world defed when‽

  • Comrade Spood
    link
    fedilink
    English
    389 days ago

    Love how they talk about being anti-sectarian and Hexbear being a place for anarchists despite them enforcing a strict platform that opposes anarchists. God I fucking hate tankies. “Oh you are welcome here as long as you follow our rules to a T and pretty much abandon all of your principles in favor of our authoritarianism.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 days ago

      That’s what gets me about hexbear, they hate trump and claim it’s because he is a fascist but in reality they love fascism, it’s just not their brand of fascism.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      119 days ago

      Just like Kronstadt, fitting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    389 days ago

    They’re not talking about Lemmy. First sentence “Across the mastodon universe…”

    He’s basically saying he wants to set up a tankie Mastodon for HexBear users. Good, let them self-quarantine.

    • petrescatraian
      link
      fedilink
      69 days ago

      I’ve noticed a few of them. Or some that simply also accept tankies on them.

    • @kuato
      link
      English
      08 days ago

      No, he’s quoting from a Mastodon instance that already exists, and has for quite a while.

        • @kuato
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Yes, that’s what I’m saying. And the quote was from said Masto instance. He wasn’t talking about setting up a new instance. He was recommending an existing one, answering the poster’s question.

  • socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259 days ago

    The absolute irony of referring to hexbear as anti-sectarian. Left lib needs to stop falling for this trap. Tankies are almost as far from an ally as you can possibly get.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 days ago

      Yep, as a left lib, a tankie is as far ideologically from you as an “anarcho-capitalist”

  • crimeschneck∈🇩🇪⊂🇪🇺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 days ago

    I don’t know the context of this comment but it seems like they are only quoting the About section of toots.matapacos.dog (hexbear-like mastodon instance), so I don’t think the title is 100% accurate even though I’m aware of lemmy.ml’s shitty moderation.

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      English
      89 days ago

      Yea I reread it and I may have misinterpreted it slightly, but the point still stands, .ml is no different than Hexbear even though they’d like us to think that to avoid a larger defed movement like what happened to Hexbear and grad. .ml still has an underlying desire to drop that mask and go full Hexbear wether it’s on their Lemmy instance or spun off to a mastodon instance on mast.lemmy.ml lol

  • @PugJesusM
    link
    English
    159 days ago

    The thing about “We can have an instance without sectarianism!” ignores that, Trotskyists splitting at the atomic level aside, the ‘sects’ are often founded on fundamentally different values, not just whether Jesus is homoousios or homoiousios.

    In the end, this means that any dispute between sects will fundamentally raise the question of values, and no community nor authority is neutral on the matter of values. Which views count as following which values (for example, if someone regarded ‘racial equality’ as including ‘racial segregation’) is a fundamental question that, itself, invites sectarian splitting.

    Ultimately, you can create a broad space, but the idea that all of the previous anti-sectarian attempts have failed simply for not being anti-sectarian enough is just… not so. Most of those ‘sectarian’ spaces are the end result of anti-sectarian attempts - because you have to draw a line somewhere, and wherever you draw the line, a large percentage of people will be upset about where it is.

    Especially leftists, since we often revel in the broader value implications of small points.

    • WatDabney
      link
      fedilink
      109 days ago

      Most of those ‘sectarian’ spaces are the end result of anti-sectarian attempts

      This is a vital observation, and not just in this narrower context but in the broader context of leftism subverted by authoritarianism.

      The thing is that we actually can have instances free of sectarianism. All it requires is a population among whom enough people hold to the value of non-sectarianism to not only establish such spaces, but for them to continue to be non-sectarian solely because nobody succeeds in driving wedges (or better yet, nobody even tries). And again, this dynamic holds in the broader context and not just in this narrower one.

      But of course the problem, at whatever scale and in whatever context, is that we don’t have such a population, and there’s no indication that such a population will come to be in our immediate future either.

      And that’s the exact point at which it starts to go wrong.

      Through some combination of indoctrination and irrationality-driven-by-impatience, some number of people, faced with that fact, decide that that means that what we have to do is force it into being, which is inevitably doomed to failure, since it essentially boils down to establishing a hierarchy by which some claim the authority to eliminate hierarchy and prohibit authority.

      • socsa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        119 days ago

        The entire problem is that progressive liberals and social Democrats are actually worlds closer to left-lib types than MLs, but MLs cannot allow that narrative to exist at any level, be it explicit or inferred.

        And that’s not to say libertarian leftists are even that close ideologically to progressive liberals. It’s more how absolutely massive the gap is between them and the authoritarian left.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 days ago

          Solid point here. The authoritarian axis is a real motherfucker when it comes to political divisiveness. Left v right doesn’t have the same impact as authoritarian v libertarian on the political compass, as flawed as the Nolan model and its derivatives might be. Nationalists are a danger regardless of which wing they claim to represent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    As an Anarchist that sounds nice and I might have even belived their pretty words if I havent been explicitly censored for calling out Russia and China. Also Blahaj is 100% a leftist space (I assume that they were referring to Blahaj), just not a tankie space and that pisses them off.

    No leftist unity with fake leftists, power to the workers not the ruling class

    • @PugJesusM
      link
      English
      199 days ago

      I don’t mind .ml users on .world so much. The moderation on .ml is fucking terrible, don’t get me wrong, but while shitty views are most common from .ml users, I don’t think they’re disruptive or excessively hostile compared to other instances.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    128 days ago

    Left-Wing Anarchists: “Fuck The US…”

    Tankie: 😄

    “… and Russia”

    Tankie: 😐

    “… and China”

    Tankie: 😡

    “Abolish Every State”

    Tankie: 🤬

  • Zeppo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 days ago

    I wonder if these people will ever figure out how sick Americans on the left are of hearing the word “liberals” used as a hate term. Yes, entirely different meaning, but it’s a great way to get non-conservative Americans to reflexively think whatever they’re reading is totally stupid shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 days ago

      What you said!!

      Liberal used to be a real political affiliation. Then the extreme right just used it to insult anyone left of them.
      Then the extreme left (tankies) used it to insult anyone right of them, including conservatives!

      “Liberal” the insult has lost all meaning now. Is it left-wing? Is it right-wing? Who knows‽ It’s both!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59 days ago

    Huh. I’m kind of surprised that he’s using big-C Communism. I guess it could be intentional.

    I’d kind of think that most people on the left would be wanting to talk about little-c communism.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 days ago

    This users actual name is Pavel. They just flipped a letter to try to blend in with the western imperialist libs. They are NOT Dave L

  • @kuato
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Reading comprehension fail. It’s a quote from the toots.matapacos.dog Mastodon instance about its goals, in answer to a question about asked about Mastodon instances.

    Considering that you’ve made it your life’s mission to convince world to defederate from ml, I can’t say I’m surprised that you might mischaracterize the comment.