• @finitebanjo
    link
    23 hours ago

    She must be an extremely awkward psychic.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    368 hours ago

    Green flag. She’s a keeper. I would have 3 grease stains on my shirt by now, minimum.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -208 hours ago

      Pretty sure that’s a kid, not sure if you should be looking at your kids in green and red flags.

      • NONE
        link
        267 hours ago

        Why do you think it’s a kid? Why would an adult like the one in the comic be so eager to wipe food off a kid’s cheeks?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I thought it was a kid at first, had to reread a couple times to understand what’s happening. Even then I’m not too sure what the cheek thing is.

        • @CrayonRosary
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Maybe it’s because the character looks like a literal child. And, yes, that would make it a bad comic. So, I agree with your interpretation.

          And I still think it’s a bad comic.

          To everyone downvoting the people who thought it was a child at first: Crop out the first cell in the comic and send it to all your friends and ask, is this a drawing of a child or an adult on a date?

            • @CrayonRosary
              link
              English
              13 hours ago

              Oh, I know. I still hate it. “Super deformed”. Yeah, that sounds about right.

          • NONE
            link
            35 hours ago

            Relax, no one is obliged to agree with anyone. You thought it was a kid, I disagree. I didn’t think it was a kid, you disagree. We each decide whether to give upvote or downvote to the post and go on with our lives.

            And my question was legit, with no malicious intent. It really didn’t cross my mind that it was a kid, but anyway…

            • @CrayonRosary
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              My reply was written while perfectly calm, with no malicious intent. 🤷

              My last paragraph was added as an edit when looking at Jax’s comment and seeing it was downvoted into oblivion. It wasn’t directed at you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -77 hours ago

          Look at the chairs, the chair practically dwarfs her.

          Not to mention, why would an adult eat like they’ve forgotten where their mouth is?

          Ya’ll can downvote me, you’re wrong.

          • NONE
            link
            117 hours ago

            It looks like you never met someone really REALLY hungry and a total mess (like myself)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -27 hours ago

              I have never eaten with an adult that is so messy that spaghetti is thrown across the table, no. I have eaten with children that messy, though.

              • NONE
                link
                45 hours ago

                Fella, you’re taking a obviously hyperbolic (exaggerated) comic to face value… Of course no adult eat like that, and that’s kinda the punchline of the comic.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                56 hours ago

                You’ve missed the joke. It’s that spaghetti is messy to eat, exaggerated for comic effect to show this date is particularly messy.

                But judging by your other comment you seem set more that this comic is telling the tale of some one who’s adopted a child and finding out said child hurls their spaghetti around.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                06 hours ago

                I’ve never met anyone who could survive a piano falling on them either. It’s a cartoon, dipshit.

          • sp3ctr4l
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Both of the chairs are extremely simplistically drawn, and are both just full backed chairs that go up to each person’s shoulders.

            The last two panels are the same perspective, just reversed, and both people are basically the same size and height.

            … they could both be kids, or both adults, or one is a very large child and the other is a diminuitive adult.

            The chairs do not evidence your claim.

            Frankly, the art style is fairly obviously modled after animal crossing humans, the whole idea is that its kind of a chibi take on young adults in terms of body frame shape, head/body proportions, with no obvious way to determine age beyond extreme age indicated by stylized wrinkles and smile lines.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -15 hours ago

              Yeah I just don’t care, I think I can count on one hand the amount of comics I can relate to from this person - I’ll just leave it at it’s not for me

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        157 hours ago

        To add to the other reply to you : if it was a child you’d assume the person in the comic is the parent in which case they would know if their child is a messy eater or not. Everything points to this being a first date with adult humans

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -3
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yep, there are no circumstances in which an adult will be eating with a child for the first time (older than a 6 year old).

          None, they don’t exist! Adoption doesn’t exist, orphans don’t exist, there are quite literally no circumstances in which this can be a child.

          Exhausting.

          • sp3ctr4l
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Never before in the history of comics has a mild attribute or action or characteristic been depicted visually in an exagerated manner.

            Certainly not for comic effect.

            Heavens no, never!

  • @expatriado
    link
    58 hours ago

    i thought this was some aunt/niece thing, the babysitting is harder than i thought kinda joke

    • @DarkCloud
      link
      3
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, the main characters cheek lines bug me too. It’s like shave or grow a beard, but don’t remain forever 17 with your crappy pig bristle bullshit.