Let’s make this place more active!

So, title. Personally after trying out pretty much every major distro save gentoo, I’ve come back to Ubuntu because it just works and I can focus on my work. Did remove snap and install flatpak, but other than that it’s mostly stock ubuntu.

  • @mayidar
    link
    81 year ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with KDE

    • mikael
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      For how long have you been using it? Have you had any breakages?

      • @mayidar
        link
        31 year ago

        For 3 days lol, no breakages at all. I’ve switched from arch after using it for several months but now I just want stable enough distro with latest plasma and btrfs snapshots without hassle and decided to give tumbleweed a try.

  • @humdrumgentleman
    link
    81 year ago

    I’m on EndeavorOS. It’s essentially Arch Linux with very specific training wheels. I switched to it about a year ago and remain exceedingly happy with it.

    • JK_Mooney
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      EndeavourOS is Arch, nicely setup for a “Daily Driver” PC and for people who don’t need to flex about installing Arch. I’ve used Arch, I like EndeavourOS better :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Another vouch for EndeavourOS being Arch but with less hassle, I have installed and maintained for years both Arch and Gentoo and while I think those two are the best way to experience and learn Linux, I don’t have as much time anymore, so I was trying out fedora for a while (left because some package lagged just a bit much for my preference; Emacs and some compilers/runtimes mainly) I wanted back into some cutting edge rolling-release distro.

        I prefer Arch over debian testing and opensuse thumbleweed because of popularity and gaming, there is bigger chance that if a game has problems, these have been found out on arch especially with the steam deck technically increasing the user base of gamers on Arch.

        EDIT: NixOS sound interesting because it might be even less time commitment to maintain I think(?), but the initial learning curve would be more time investment that EndeavourOS is since I’m very acquainted with how to upkeep and Arch system that I daily drive.

  • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
    link
    71 year ago

    Ubuntu Budgie is my main OS. Works well but if I install another I’ll give NixOS a spin. I like the idea of generally immutable systems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      I really like NixOS so far. It’s definitely got some quirks, and trying to install anything that’s not in the repository is, by design, a real pain in the ass. But the general idea seems to work really, really well. It’s cool how a lot of tasks that are really involved on other distros just come down to “add this line to your nix config file”.

  • @awkward2467
    link
    61 year ago

    I’ve been using Fedora for the past couple of years, but have been putting some time into NixOS VM’s recently

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fedora Kinoite:

    Technically Universal Blue:

    I was on Fedora KDE since 32.

    But as of late, RPM Fusion drops the ball more and more often.

    Package lag time was breaking updates on my AMD system even. Unless you swap mesa/mesa-freeworld back to update…

    Because I like hardware acceleration and encoding/decoding -.-

    Universal Blue takes the pain away for AMD and Nvidia users alike. Think Chromebook easy but it’s Fedora.

    I’m embracing Flatpaks now. For things not available as flatpaks, I just export from a toolbox or Distrobox.

    I have a messy writeup here:

    I thank Steam Deck for making me realize immutable/cloud based image-Desktop isn’t scary anymore.

    • @Secret300
      link
      11 year ago

      I tried using silverblue for a while and I used distrobox but felt a little weird having a few of my packages in a container. I think I’ll go back to it soon because I am interested in it

  • evets511
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Gone through many distros. Always end up back with Ubuntu as it just works for when I need to get things done.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Pop!_OS on my laptop for everything except gaming. Programming, media consumption, reading, etc. I am much more productive using their stupid simple tiling window manager.

    On my servers/cloud VM’s I run Ubuntu Server.

    On my NAS I run TrueNAS Scale. To be completely honest I kind of regret “upgrading” from TrueNAS to TrueNAS Scale. It’s less performant and the amount of issues I’ve had with their application setup made me completely abandon it and just run Docker on a separate computer, which defeated the entire purpose of installing Scale. I’m sure they’ll iron everything out over time and it’s not like the performance is horrendous, it’s just incomparable to good ol’ regular TrueNAS (based on BSD instead of Linux with great ZFS support).

  • chi-chan~
    link
    51 year ago

    Arch. I’m thinking about using NixOS too.

  • TanknSpank
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Ubuntu. Keeps it simple and streamlined between my PC, my servers and my EC2 servers.

  • HyperHysteria
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Ubuntu, it just works. Hardly notice any genuine issues with Snaps as well, but I also rarely use them.

  • @njinx
    link
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Manjaro i3wm edition held together by duct tape and willpower