• @Droggelbecher
    link
    410 hours ago

    socialism

    GDP

    Ok yeah I won’t even need to read the rest

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      I mean tbf if a single country adopted socialism it would still have a GDP of some kind as long as there was the need for goods that came from outside the country. Hell you could have the ideal communist society but would still have to trade for something because no land on earth has all of the resources a modern society needs.

  • ArchRecord
    link
    fedilink
    English
    819 hours ago

    Socialism, commonly known for the very little, unimportant factor of having workers own the means of production, now includes a stock market where people can buy a share of the means of production, using capital, without ever having worked there, or anywhere, ever?

    News to me.

    • @PugJesusM
      link
      English
      619 hours ago

      As a wise tankie recently said to me, about the CCP’s stock market:

      Owning stock in a company does not give you control over the means of production. Sorry bud.

  • @ZILtoid1991
    link
    318 hours ago

    In Hungary, a lot of companies are state owned*, I guess I now live in a communist utopia under comrade Viktor Orbán.

    * at max 25%, only so the losses can be subsidized by the state, and old people that wanted “the good old days” back could cheer that “the industries were nationalized”.

  • @PugJesusM
    link
    English
    202 days ago

    “NO, compromise is NOT acceptable, we MUST implement socialism NOW; otherwise you’re all fascists and completely identical” - Tankies when democracy

    “Um, aktually, sweatie, materialist analysis DEMANDS we be capitalist first” - Tankies when no democracy

    • fxomtOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      the material conditions forcing stalin to recriminialize homosexuality:

  • Flying Squid
    link
    312 days ago

    There are over 800 billionaires in China… but I don’t know of any factories where the workers control the means of production.

    • fxomtOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 days ago

      800 Billionaires

      What is that, CIA propaganda comrade? Please correct your source to our glorious red propaganda.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        162 days ago

        Sorry, I am a Western imperialist capitalist propagandist dog.

        Incidentally, there are only 756 billionaires in the U.S.

        • fxomtOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 days ago

          That’s more like it comrade. Do that again and you’ll get the wall!

    • fxomtOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      Sounds like counterrevolutionary propaganda… i’d be careful not accidentally fall out of any windows if i were you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If the public doesn’t control the political parties or their political orientation through voting or councils, socialism is pretty useless, it could even be argued that a society with an illiberal state cannot be socialist, because while it may not have an owning class it sure has a bureaucratic ruling class.

    Read: The Average Joe in China cannot decide what their workplace is doing.

      • fxomtOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        Exactly, you can’t liberate people by shackling them.

        But I guess war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength.

    • @Pilferjinx
      link
      42 days ago

      “Trust me, bro. Your suffering is in your best interest.”

    • fxomtOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      Your comment inspired me to create a post about it, thanks lmao

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “China is Socialist”

    • The Leading party literally named “Communist”

    Not that any of them really mean anything

    • fxomtOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 days ago

      Tbf they’re used a lot as synonyms in marxism. Ultimately it’s still a state capitalist hell hole

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        It ultimately depends upon the people.

        • Capitalist laws work well, with peoples’ mentality being community oriented.
        • Communist laws work well with capital oriented mentality.
        • Nothing works when bandits are given all the power.
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            I’m not *-ist. I don’t do *-ism.
            My thoughts don’t depend upon what a certain group of people may/may not consider acceptable.

            • fxomtOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 days ago

              Yeah labels are vague but they’re good at getting a general idea of what you support. For example I don’t label myself much generally, but i just say i’m a libertarian socialist or anarchist. It’s what you believe that actually matters.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 days ago

                The problem with catchphrase labels is that it creates the same problems as the word “God” has for thousands of years.
                It encourages people to think less and empowers those who would use this to destroy rationality in groups and use said groups to destroy people for their own agenda.

                • fxomtOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  True, it’s more important to focus on your own beliefs than subscribing to a single ideology.