This guy tweeted about the show he was working on when he damn well knew he wasn’t supposed to do that. He reached a legal settlement.
This sounds like sour grapes.
I’ve know Sources and Alleged Sources a long time, if they say that’s what happened then I see absolutely no reason to doubt them. Why would Sources and Alleged Sources stick their necks out and lie, what would they gain?
He also sent sexually explicit and suggestive messages to a bunch of coworkers, fostering an uncomfortable work environment. He’s just an attention whore.
So this is addressed in the article and is a major part of the point. I don’t know if I believe what he has to say on the topic, but I think it’s worth reading, especially since it is easier for a major company to write a narrative than it is for a single creator to disprove one
Oh, geez. I didn’t read that far down the article. Yikes