Particularly zombie apocalypse, but also more generally as well. Many seem to be about post-apocalypse, but the chaos and confusion at the beginning seems like such a fruitful idea. Yet that’s so rarely done/done well as far as I know for zombie movie/shows, except for shows like Dead Set UK. Is it because of the budget, or that such shows/movies cannot be milked forever like TWD?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    This applies to most media, not only movies. My favorite part of The Stand by Stephen King was the gradual transition of civilized society to chaos in the beginning of the pandemic.

    • @inspxtrOP
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      By “this”, do you mean the lack of media about the transition? So “The Stand” is just a rare example for books?

      I love close examination of that transition, it’s usually anxiety inducing, ethic-questioning, rule-breaking that is really great to see. When the dust settles post-apocalypse, these things seem to be taken for granted.

    • @inspxtrOP
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Maybe I wasn’t clear? I meant the chaotic transition from normal life to apocalypse.

  • Hillock
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Zombies have the issue that they aren’t a real threat to society anymore. Even if they can sprint, modern weapons just make them too easy to deal with. So you can have the initial stages of the main characters making it to safety, which is commonly included in Zombie media. But then the phase from initial outbreak to collapse of society can’t be explained, skipping it is way easier. You would need to go rather unrealistic ways to explain the collapse but the genre kinda lives on the plausibility of the events. World War Z for example can’t be taken seriously. That doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad but it’s a different kind of genre.

    Then you also run into the issue of the initial stages being rather boring. If a big part of humanity died rather quickly, there is an abundance of resources for those remaining. Looting a single supermarket would give you enough food for months or years. And anyone semi-intelligent would just hunker down somewhere safe. It’s easier to create urgency if there is a lack of resources.

    This also applies to many other apocalyptic events. Either humanity dies out almost immediately or the collapse becomes hard to explain.

    You would need a slow moving apocalyptic event to show the collapse of humanity. Something like climate change. But then it’s more interesting to focus on other parts rather than the survival of the main character. So we end up with a different genre.

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I thought The Leftovers did a good job with this. The premise is that one day 2% of the world’s population just vanishes with no explanation which is not devastating to the population, but the world sort of gradually collapses under the psychological weirdness of the whole thing.

  • @Lakija
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Hmm. Well if a zombie apocalypse takes too long it might be eradicated.

    Wait; no, that’s bullshit. We just found out people around the world are just dumb or stubborn enough, especially in my country, to let a virus proliferate.

    I dunno. The Last of Us did a good job. Some of my favorite parts were the flashbacks to when the fungus was first discovered. The dread of what was to come, the way the government handled things. It was interesting.