ETA:

For accuracy, the chart is old (2014) and references discretionary spending instead of mandatory which is where programs like SNAP (Food Stamps) generally fall

However, even accounting for all that properly, at the time of the meme, food stamps would have still been just 2% of the federal budget. Thus the spirit of the meme is still good.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/36521

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    162 days ago

    Is the chart accurate? Do we have a source?

    I ask because I don’t see where social security would fit at all, and I suspect that Medicare/Medicaid would be a larger portion than the 5% listed for health.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        92 days ago

        Yeah, it’s blatantly dishonest for OP’s chart to be labeled “Federal Spending” when it doesn’t include the majority of federal spending categories. Particularly when the goal is for the reader to point at the largest spending category, despite the chart not including the largest spending categories.

        • @marcos
          link
          12 days ago

          deleted by creator

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      122 days ago

      Yes and no, a reverse image search pulled up this answer on stack exchange https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/36521

      It’s old, and only represents discretionary spending vs mandatory (which is where food stamps/SS/Medi* would be) but according to them for food stamps specifically it would still only be about 2% of the federal budget

    • @Tyrangle
      link
      7
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Social security and Medicare are considered mandatory spending. The chart above is presumably showing discretionary spending, which is a subset of the overall budget. I can’t speak to it’s accuracy beyond that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 days ago

    If this community is going to continue to exist, memes like this may need to be reworded. The old community was a fount of bad faith and it’s easy to respond to bad faith with more of the same but moving forward we probably need less call outs and more discussion, less finger pointing and more understanding.

    Last week’s mods didn’t want that. Their goal seemed to be (and this is the best faith I can put on the situation) the representation of under represented viewpoints, i.e. conservative viewpoints. Unfortunately that resulted in an extremely useless echo chamber full of circle jerking, JAQing off, bootlicking, whataboutism, and sealioning.

    I can’t tell you how excited I am about these mods having their power taken away, but we can’t replace them with the same divisive tactics and say anything has improved.

    • @marcos
      link
      52 days ago

      Unfortunately that resulted in an extremely useless echo chamber full of circle jerking, JAQing off, bootlicking, whataboutism, and sealioning.

      Oh, man, I was curious about how people would actually act on this community, but it seems I decided to not check on the one week it got from zero attention, to overflowing with bad behavior, and felt down!