• @CptEnder
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    34 minutes ago

    Republic of Ireland. Never invaded a foreign country’s soil, formed literally to get rid of imperial rule.

    Estonia works too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 hours ago

    I don’t think Korea has ever been imperial, they’ve always been too busy not being conquered

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 hour ago

        Not really sure that 13 years with no imperial ambitions counts as an empire. Unless the words are all that counts, I’m which case the US isn’t an empire

        • @chonglibloodsport
          link
          English
          114 minutes ago

          Are you trying to No True Scotsman the Korean Empire? They’re on the list! They even lasted longer (by 1 year) than Nazi Germany did as an empire!

          Anyway I’d encourage you to look at the list. There have been many empires in history. You don’t have to be one of the “great empires” (such as the Kushite Empire) to be on the list.

    • @Shapillon
      link
      English
      33 hours ago

      I’d instinctively put Vietnam in that same bag.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 hours ago

        I did think about Vietnam, but I think they were pretty aggressive towards Cambodia during and after their war of independence. I’m also not sure how much you want to include the Dai Viet as part of the current state or where you would rate it’s imperial-ness

  • @thevoidzero
    link
    English
    98 hours ago

    Unified by war I don’t know if you’d find one, but even just “no genocide” you’ll only find a few. I was shocked with the Wikipedia page about genocide seeing how many countries had done it, or are doing it.

    • @YarHarSuperstar
      link
      English
      58 hours ago

      Yeah. Its pretty much constant throughout history. I have hope that can change, but it’s absolutely ongoing and we’ve got a ways to go.

  • @TwoBeeSan
    link
    English
    89 hours ago

    Had a lady ask the room if anyone felt guilty after a Texas history discussion.

    Reminds me of this meme.

    In literally everyone’s history you’ll find groups taking advantage of lesser thans for personal gain. We didn’t load the cannon or sharpen the spears. We can learn, acknowledge and progress (ideally)

    Guilt as an emotion doesn’t do anything for you. Use it for something at least… like kidnapping people and requesting extradition to fantasy land. Lol

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    English
    31
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I had somebody trying to tell me Bhutan was the perfect communism a couple of weeks ago.

    It’s a monarchy where everybody lives like medieval peasants so that the rich and powerful can run the world’s most exclusive resort off their labor.

    • @idiomaddict
      link
      English
      613 hours ago

      I was just thinking about a conversation I had with someone here a while ago who asked whether there was a country which doesn’t prioritize GDP, then seemed to be annoyed that Bhutan, the country I found fitting that description, wasn’t rich (though iirc, conditions have improved since they stopped prioritizing GDP).

      I’m not trying to start drama, I’m not invested, but I am autistic and this explains why the conversation wasn’t successful, so thanks 😊

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The Federal Republic of Germany is non-imperialist, since it’s imperialist predecessors ceased to exist and a new nation was formed

    • @edgemaster72
      link
      English
      123 minutes ago

      Historians hate this one weird trick!

    • @Droggelbecher
      link
      English
      14 hours ago

      Genius strategy. Just rename your country and change its constitution etc, your new country will have committed zero atrocities! Never mind that you’ll continue to profit from the predecessor country’s imperialism.

    • @PugJesusOPM
      link
      English
      1813 hours ago

      A likely excuse!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Well, the FRG (BRD) is the legal successor of the German Empire. The GDR (DDR) always emphasized, it/she is not.

      • Krik
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 hours ago

        That is so but the German Reich as an entity still exists but completely lost his people and all state organs, institutions and public authorities. Technically is still has land, that is occupied by FRG and Poland today.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Germany

        There are some Germans that think they can declare themselves citizens of the German Reich. But that can’t be as there are no authorities of the German Reich anymore that can conduct immigration processes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 hours ago

        Assuming one accepts the USSR and its bloc as inherently non-imperialistic.

        If so, though, good news: the DDR still exists. There’s an uninhabited island off Cuba that Fidel Castro gifted to the DDR, which has not passed into possession of the Bundesrepublik.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          The Ernst Thälmann Island (Cayo Ernesto Thaelmann) was only named after the KPD leader, but not gifted to the DDR in terms of its territory. While, the English Wikipedia article is not distinct in that point and mentions the island being “gifted”, the German one is very clear, that only its name should honour the substitute saint of the DDR Ernst Thälmann while the territory remained part of Cuba.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 hours ago

      Just ask Greece how non-imperialist Germany is. /j

      Also: Economic warfare is a form of warfare, too.

  • @DragonsInARoom
    link
    English
    1012 hours ago

    South Sudan? New country must be so much better than the imperialist countries with a history

  • @Dasus
    link
    English
    1013 hours ago

    Most counties which formed by separating from an empire.

    I mean, I guess you’d need to narrow the definition a bit.

    I was thinking of a lot of former colonialised nations, but lots of those also have history of conquest before they became colonised.

    Then Finland? Well, by our actions, pretty much. But O can’t say that it was because people didn’t want to.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Finland

    Perhaps “proto-imperialist” would be better suited to describe that. Well, irredentist, officially. (Rather rare, didn’t know that word.)

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      1013 hours ago

      Bit of a problem there, yeah. This hostage taker needs to define both “imperialist” and “country”, or I’m shoving his ass into 2006-founded Montenegro and accepting zero complaints about it.

  • @Gradually_Adjusting
    link
    English
    913 hours ago

    It’s a fool’s errand. What you really want is a country with a strong social safety net and vivid regrets about their recent imperialism.

  • AwesomeLowlander
    link
    fedilink
    English
    313 hours ago

    A bunch of the younger nations probably qualify. Both Norway and Malaysia might, depending on your criteria for imperialism.