• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s actually old hat. Users on r/cth (where hexbear came from) were catching admin bans for upvoting the “wrong” posts years ago.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5410 hours ago

    I left Reddit because they killed 3rd party apps. Since that day, they’ve only gone on to butcher the platform even further.

    Joining Lemmy was a damn good decision.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 hours ago

      Enshitification drives stock prices. Only the rich care about stock prices and they have no interest in using the platform. The platform dies off a death of a thousand cuts… story as old as time

      • Fonzie!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 minutes ago

        I think it’s more stock prices / shareholders drive enshittification

    • @SidewaysHighways
      link
      English
      109 hours ago

      damn good indeed! plus with a proper app for mastodon and pixelfed we’ve got it all!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Its still not as bad as how Twitter works. If you wanna say “kill all the (group)” you just search for someone else who wrote it and then retweet that. Then if someone challenges you, you just say “not my words bro”.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Context:

    Reddit will now issue warnings to users who “upvote several pieces of content banned for violating our policies” within “a certain timeframe,” starting first with violent content, the company announced on Wednesday.

    “This will have no impact on the vast majority of users as most already downvote or report abusive content,” a Reddit employee says in the announcement post. In comments on the post, a user expressed concern that the new policy could make people “paranoid about voting,” but the employee says that “this would be an unacceptable side effect, which is why we want to monitor this closely and ramp it up thoughtfully.”

    If it violates policies, remove it and move on. This is weird.

    “We have done this in the past for quarantined communities and found that it did help to reduce exposure to bad content, so we are experimenting with this sitewide,” according to the main post. Reddit “may consider” expanding the warnings in the future to cover repeated upvotes of other kinds of actions as well as taking other types of actions in addition to warnings.

    Now that there is Thoughtcrime territory.

    • @CluckN
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      “Hey investors look away from the huge pile of porn we’re hosting and look at these cool content filters we’re adding”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 hours ago

      This reminds me lots of when Facebook started applying warnings/bans/etc retroactively to content without any context. I remember getting several wrist slaps in the same month for content I had shared a decade prior that really wasn’t all that bad. But Facebook decided it was a problem and made me question what I was allowed to post in the future. It didn’t take long after that for me to stop using Facebook completely.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 hours ago

    Just another way to allow hateful right wing content to stay up while punishing users who aren’t retarded for upvoting Luigi memes and saying trump is a fascist etc

    What else is new on Reddit? They should just pull the trigger and make an official bigots only policy like twitter

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The exact wording seems to be “banned content”, which includes a lot more than just violence (is violence banned in the first place, considering subs like r/PublicFreakout?).

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      English
      010 hours ago

      Yeah tbh if it were just violent content I’d be fine with that. I still don’t trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I’d be 100% understanding of the rule.

      Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That’s absurd. That’s way too broad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        Guarantee something like posting a picture of Luigi will be considered banned content promoting violence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 hours ago

        “Violent content” could also be videos of officer misconduct, and there’s the whole can of worms of what “promoting violence” means.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -210 hours ago

      I think it’s advocating violence, and extreme violence (things like terrorist beheading videos and such) that are banned. Things like Waffle House fights likely won’t meet the banning threshold.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 hours ago

        I assume this is prompted by Luigi-inspired death threats to CEOs. If they are monitoring this so closely, I bet the FBI might want to take a look at those records too…

      • @finitebanjo
        link
        English
        410 hours ago

        I think it very well could, as well as any other reddit corporate agenda such as removing content at request of pieces of shit who punch and berate service staff and then later sue to remove said content from the internet. It’s a necessary distinction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      It used to be a word for people who defended Stalin sending tanks to Hungary in the 50s. It caught on in leftist discourse as a word for leftists who excuse illegitimate state violence, domestically and abroad. Though on Lemmy, like reddit before it, it’s mostly thrown around at anyone who disagrees that the US used to a be radiant light in the world until 2016 or anyone left of Pelosi.

      • Fonzie!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        It used to be a word for people who defended Stalin sending tanks to Hungary in the 50s. It caught on in leftist discourse as a word for leftists who excuse illegitimate state violence, domestically and abroad

        Correct etymology of the word!

        Though on Lemmy, like reddit before it, it’s mostly thrown around at anyone who disagrees that the US used to a be radiant light in the world until 2016 or anyone left of Pelosi

        LMAO no much worse, it’s “leftist I think is crazy”, so who is and isn’t a “tankie” depends on the person using the word; although it generally means someone who is pro hardcore Communism a la Stalin.

      • @BallShapedMan
        link
        English
        25 hours ago

        Lol that makes a lot of sense. Thank you!

    • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 hours ago

      Since we’re counting to ten:

      Classic tankies are the authoritarian leaning communists, that is communists willing to use (military) power to accomplish their goals and will voice those more aggressive sounding opinions.

    • blaue_Fledermaus
      link
      fedilink
      88 hours ago

      To me seems to be people that think that the evil imperialist actions of countries that claim(ed) to be Communist are excused by the evil imperialist actions of the USA.

    • Undearius
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -29 hours ago

      You’re about to get 10 different answers, most would say

      • Any user from the Lemmygrad and Hexbear instances, and some from Lemmy.ml

      • Genocide deniers

      • Pro-Russia and pro-China users

      I think it’s just a derogatory term for anyone that’s anti-imperialism/liberalism

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -69 hours ago

      People who support real communism. Think the USSR and Communist China. They’re called tamkies because they used tanks to kill civilians.

  • MochiGoesMeow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 hours ago

    I hate the uprising of the word tankie like the rise of the word woke. Just more language to make walls between people.

  • @arotrios
    link
    English
    38 hours ago

    In case you’re wondering what’s considered “violent content” on Reddit and how far they’ll push this definition, calling the top 10 breakdown of healthcare CEOs “Luigi’s List” counts.

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    English
    -710 hours ago

    In general, aligning with Tankies for any reason, ever, will just trigger a reactionary bias against whatever message you’re promoting. I’m not saying I dissagree automatically, but it’s the opposite of helping your case.

    When Tankies agree with a statement I have to stop for a moment and reassess how that statement can be used to maim and destroy western democracies or if they’re just making another show of pretending to have morals.

    • @Valmond
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah we can both hate tankies (lovers of brutal dictatorships) and reddit (a now sucky media platform).

      This post is quite crappy and wrong IMO.