• Metaright
    link
    fedilink
    6311 months ago

    When not even the companies take these massive documents seriously, it’s clear that we need to rethink how this all works.

    • RQG
      link
      2811 months ago

      True. It doesn’t even state what happens if I have a pre-established eldritch pact going before signing this.

    • Syo
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      I don’t mind these contacts / TOS. But the courts have to separate fixed contaycts open to the public vs. negotiated contracts in private.

      Fixed contacts, which do not allow for negotiations, should not be able to use individual arbitration clause.

    • @DV8
      link
      1011 months ago

      They do take it seriously enough to mention that jurisdiction fir everything except clause 5 is in Ireland. This definitely went to some lawyer before they used it

      • DacoTaco
        link
        311 months ago

        Obviously, shits very serious so clauses to exclude clause 5 needed to be written. That said, still hilarious to see

    • @ultimate_question
      link
      7
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Agreed, sneaking crap like this in contracts should be grounds for nullifying them since it shows the companies don’t have the expectation that people who click the accept button have read through 20 pages of deliberately obtuse legal junk (never mind actually understanding it enough to make an informed decision to agree to it).

      That’s not even mentioning the shitty condescending attitude of “lol look at this wacky stuff we do…but we’re reserving the right to financially destroy you based on the terms hidden in this document alone”

  • Bruisedback
    link
    fedilink
    28
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m pretty sure they do it to prove copyright infringement should another dev/publisher copy and paste their exact agreement into their game or service, like how cartographers put fake cities/landmarks on a map to easily prove someone copied their work. I remember an AWS service having a “zombie apocalypse” clause at some point.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    1811 months ago

    No Eldritch compacts? The old gods will not like that. Blessed suffering awaits those who agree to these terms.

    • The Picard ManeuverOP
      link
      911 months ago

      Also the attorney at Larian that had to approve the TOS.

      “…you want to put what in there now?”

  • @Glemek
    link
    611 months ago

    Seems rude to ban warlock in the eula, but still put them in game…