- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Why would you go with over ReactOS?
They are far closer to cloning Windows 95/98/2000.
ReactOS is cloning NT, so the 2000 part of that is correct.
95/98/98se/ME are completely different beasts, even if they happen to share the same GUI.
I am well aware of the difference between 95/98 and 2000/XP. I actually used 95/98 and eventually switched to 2000 and then XP.
Turns out that ReactOS is indeed focused on turn of the millennium NT support. They say their target is Windows Server 2003.
I always thought that 95/98 era support was also a key goal due to he history of the project.
Same reason why there are so many text editors that all do basically the same thing, I suppose. More options are not a bad idea, IMO. Maybe they’ll do something different and interesting.
A text editor is a whole different beast than cloning Windows 95/98/2000. I will note that ReactOS isn’t simply building a compatibility layer, their end goal is to allow users to actually run unmodified driver binaries from that era to get hardware working.
True
Waiting for Action Retro coverage now.
in 3 -2 -1
deleted by creator
