• @taxiiiii
    link
    16
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I mean, I was super curious what Sanders could’ve done if he had the chance. Instead, we got the opposite experiment.

    If democrats in the US vote for stuff like Biden, then they’re not voting for any radical change. Trump isn’t comparable to that.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 hours ago

      If democrats in the US vote for stuff like Biden, then they’re not voting for any radical change

      I don’t exactly know the details, but weren’t there accusations of meddling from the DNC that stoppered Sanders’ chance of securing the nomination, and a belief among some that he might have won the nomination if it had been a free and fair primary process?

      In other words, it’s possible (though by no means certain) that your sentence above works if “democrats” means “the DNC and the establishment of the Democratic Party”, but not if it means “people who by-and-large support the Democratic Party”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        139 minutes ago

        The Dems did some delegate fuckery where all candidates endorsed Biden because Bernie Trump had to be stopped at all cost, and their delegates went to Biden even if he hadn’t been voted for. Kamala contributed all of her 0 delegates and got VP for being a cop the first to drop out iirc.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        They were only able to because of the way he went about it. He could have simply ordered the Department of Education to immediately forgive the loans and erase any record of the debt, and dared the SCOTUS to order him to create new debts (which he could simply ignore).

      • @taxiiiii
        link
        12 hours ago

        Probably, but I’d only believe that there is really nothing to be done once I see someone actually left-leaning attempt everything in their toolbox.

        I believe Sanders would have tried to change as much as possible in the US. I also believe that he would have failed regarding a lot of things. Would have really liked to see him try though.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      134 hours ago

      Americans voted for Biden because the primary system heavily favored Biden and Americans were told Biden was “more electable” than Bernie, even though every one of Bernie’s policies and his messaging polled better.

      If the DNC didn’t put their thumbs on the scale, Bernie would have won in 2016 (or 2020), and guaranteed a democratic victory in the next election because nobody receiving free healthcare is going to vote to go back to the current system.

      Bernie isn’t radical, he’s a social democrat, he just looks radical because the democrats are right of George W Bush right now.

      • @taxiiiii
        link
        2
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I get it and I don’t disagree, but- Well, I for one wouldn’t mind some radical change. Just not in the direction that it is going right now. Radical in itself is nothing bad, when the status quo is as bad as it is.

  • @Tikiporch
    link
    8620 hours ago

    Democrats so afraid of being wrong they don’t even try to do what’s right.

    • @Bloomcole
      link
      4717 hours ago

      That’s not their purpose, they just need to look the part. They are comfortable in the ‘my hands are tied’ position. They can propose bills they know will not make it. When they have a supermajority, like they had not long ago, they are in trouble. They have no choice but to stop proposing bills and find reasons to say they are ‘sabotaged’. They played this game for centuries, still works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        135 minutes ago

        They can propose bills they know will not make it.

        they actively work to ensure don’t make it. Manchin, Sinema and others like them are greatly valued by Dems for their role as scapegoats.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        They in this case being libs in liberal democracies, not democrats specifically.

        One way to resolve the contradiction between the capitalist class, which the state represents, and the masses, whom the state requires to maintain power is for the masses to believe their representatives want what’s best for them, but are powerless to implement it due to foreigners or nature or some other group, or are trying and it will happen some indeterminate time in the future.

        • @Bloomcole
          link
          8
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          What’s this today? Been in the fediverse for barely 2 weeks only to be dissapointed by the same manufactured consent from its users (minus the bots).
          All of a sudden I see anti-capitalist posts and based comments.
          The ‘libs’ in Europe would be the shamelessly named socialist parties.
          Invariably being horrible and keeping the status quo with only difference that they now and then throw a bone to the beloved working class and have their larping day on the 1st of may, sing the internationale like they mean it.

            • @Bloomcole
              link
              312 hours ago

              I know about these 2 also just learned they defederated (and what that means).
              Any more tips?

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                78 hours ago

                .world defederated from them, meaning .world accounts cannot see their content. They still have very active posting, just not in your view.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                I know it’s tough, but consider making another account on an instance that is defederated with as few instances as possible. Then you can pick and choose which instance you yourself don’t want to see anymore.

                You can block instances, communities, and users in your settings menu.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 hours ago

                  consider making another account on an instance that is defederated with as few instances as possible

                  Any recommendations for such an instance? Or recommendations on where to find such information?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3119 hours ago

      They are not afraid of being wrong. They don’t actually care about your well being, they are just here to make money for their corporate friends and themselves.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        That’s the thing, the left adhere themselves to unwritten rules and current precedences. Whereas the right will break all precedent and scoff at unwritten rules and will try to change the written ones in their favour. It happens everywhere, it’s not just a US thing

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Liberals who like the status quo adhere themselves to unwritten rules and current precedences

          You’re getting lost in the sauce. These unwritten rules and precedence (and the written rules) aren’t an end in and of themselves, they’re tools you can use to accomplish specific tasks. When a SCOTUS judge decides to use a specific interpretation of the constitution, it’s not because the constitution is a sacred text and god came down to him and showed him the correct way to interpret it, it’s because he understands the effects of promoting that particular interpretation in the way power will be wielded.

          When democrats decide to let the rules or the parliamentarian or w/e stop them from doing what their constituents want, it’s not because they just hate the idea of someone breaking a rule, it’s because it gives them an excuse not to do something their donors don’t want.

        • @wpb
          link
          126 minutes ago

          We’re talking about democrats here. They’re a firmly right wing party.

    • @wpb
      link
      127 minutes ago

      You misunderstand their incentives. They’re beholden to the billionaires, not to you.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    67
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Really though, beyond the Dems doing something legislatively, could you imagine if the party actually utilized it’s network for direct action campaigns. Not that their donors or upper middle class members would be copacetic to any actual economic disruption. I mean christ, the Senate leader doesn’t even want to let the Republicans shut down the government while they’re busy dismantling it. Their current strategy is to appeal by saying they can bring back business as usual. Unfortunately they don’t seem to understand that appearing ineffectual turns centrists off even more than appearing radical does.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Unfortunately they don’t seem to understand that appearing ineffectual turns centrists off even more than appearing radical does.

      Does it though?

      Look at how much .world or reddit downvote and deride posts critical of Democrat behavior since the beginning on the election and the only takeaway you can get is that they’re in onboard with it no matter how much they hate it simply because Republicans are worse.

      • @grue
        link
        -1
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Okay, let me spell it out, yet again, since people still apparently don’t get it: making a tactical decision to avoid expressing criticism during an election is not the same thing as being perfectly happy with what the party is doing. It’s harm reduction, not agreement.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          23 hours ago

          That “tactical decision” enabled the democrats to sleepwalk into oblivion.

          The only way the democrats could have won the last election is if they stopped trying to be “reasonable republicans” and instead used every tool available to accomplish what their constituents want. Like what the republicans are doing, but for good things like women’s healthcare and not drowning migrant children in the Rio.

          • @grue
            link
            -12 hours ago

            And there was exactly 0% chance of screeching “don’t vote for Kamala” in October accomplishing that, and everyone knew it. The only motivation for continuing to screech at that point was to concern troll in favor of Trump.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              21 hour ago

              Nobody was screeching “don’t vote for Kamala”, we were telling Kamala what she needed to do to win. Instead she listened to the same campaign that killed Biden’s shot and we all lost because of it.

              Nothing I could have done would have made genocide popular. Nothing I could have done would have made Kamala pledging to build the wall and get tough on crime look like anything but an admission that Trump was right the whole time.

          • @grue
            link
            02 hours ago

            No, in terms of proximate causes, failure to perform harm reduction did that.

            If you wanted to actually fix the Democrats’ neoliberal bullshit, the time for that was in 2021-early 2024, not fucking October! Screeching about third-parties in October was purely pro-fascist concern trolling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 hours ago

        Look at how much .world or reddit downvote and deride posts critical of Democrat behavior since the beginning on the election

        Agreed, but why should we still presume that upvotes reflect genuine user opinion as opposed to astroturfing?

        It seems that lib-aligned groups use Reddit to manufacture approval for their clients. Given this, why should we view Reddit as a credible window into popular opinion? The entire site is an infomercial at this point

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1219 hours ago

        Ok, but that’s a select group of people who choose to spend their free time typing about politics online. If you look at the actual election results, it would appear to back up the claim you’re quoting.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          that’s a select group of people

          Analyzing your query: It is indeed challenging to accurately verify if responses on Reddit originate from authentic human participants or sophisticated algorithmic entities. Therefore, the reliability of Reddit discourse as representative data remains uncertain.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        618 hours ago

        They’re on board because the party moved to the right for them.

      • ✺roguetrick✺
        link
        719 hours ago

        I mean I usually post in world and not ml and I don’t get generally get downvoted for these opinions by anybody but pugjesus.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I’m not exactly sure, but from what I’ve heard you make your own instance and you can see who voted how with admin tools.

            • ✺roguetrick✺
              link
              210 hours ago

              You can also do so from some mbin instances. It was a default feature for all users on kbin.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 hours ago

              i’m aware of this and it only makes me wonder at why the admins seemingly don’t bother to keep to track.

              • ✺roguetrick✺
                link
                410 hours ago

                Some do. You see some communities ban users that do nothing but downvote the communities posts from the all feed instead of just blocking them.

          • ✺roguetrick✺
            link
            412 hours ago

            In those conversations it’s because each downvote is closely associated with a reply though there are ways to see I don’t actually use them. And I was mostly joking.

          • ✺roguetrick✺
            link
            12
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Context to getting downvoted for demonstrating the Democrats ineffectualism to pugjesus? You’d know if you knew. He gets mad and says that everyone who didn’t have solidarity for him as a disabled person wanted to kill him. While he had no solidarity for Palestinians. We came from kbin together so me, him, and the late downpunxx had fun times. Sorry if I’m not entirely coherent, I’m drunk posting for the first time in over a year.

              • ✺roguetrick✺
                link
                3
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                I’m under the impression that he has fans on hexbear, but I don’t get hexbear over here on world.

                Edit: oh I’m being cryptically sarcastic, I mean they really don’t seem to like him. Overall it doesn’t bother me.

  • @venusaur
    link
    2221 hours ago

    Yall been taking the bait for years. Dems succeed on your fears. Why would they eliminate them?

      • @venusaur
        link
        26 hours ago

        Wow. The ugliest, dumbest, small pee pee, cuckest take on the internet right here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Yes, Democrats are bizarre and stupid so any take inspired by them is precisely that; but it needs to be said for the fools who agree w them to serve as a mirror.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1817 hours ago

      Promise overwhelmingly popular left policy, start implementing it in the states you control, use every tool at your disposal to block republican policy. If the courts have to kill your legislation or governor’s orders, make them do it, and if possible, do it in ways that can’t be undone, such as forgiveness of debts.

      eg, if you have the legislature and there is a republican governor, strip all powers from the governorship until you have it again. If you’re in the minority party, block everything that you wouldn’t do if you had total control while telling the public it is exactly what you will do when you get power. Stop pretending the courts are apolitical, appoint judges that will help you accomplish your agenda and will block the republicans.

      Build power at the local level by responding to your constituents needs. Even if you didn’t win the elections, democrats need to work with unions and local organizations, not expect loyalty while ignoring them and providing no resources.

      Under no circumstances do you agree to republican framing and suggest you need to build the wall, engage in trade wars with China, fund the police to stop a crime wave, try to be the “patriotic” party etc. You cannot outflank the republicans from the right.

      When Trump’s ICE blackbags a student, we don’t need Chuck Schumer out there agreeing with Trump that he is a horrible person for supporting Palestine but disagreeing with Trump’s methods.