Sucking the cocks of the rich will never be a winning strategy to attract a working class voters, the interests of the voters Democrats take for granted are fundementally at odds with the interests of their doners.
So your strategy is to convince the 35% of the population who vote Democrat like it’s their sports team to change their minds, and then the centrists from both sides as well?
Do you see why that’s not a winning approach?
I love the rage. Keep that. Is the impotence you need to learn to part with. If you can’t use all the tools at your disposal to win, then you choose to lose and you’re no better than the fascists.
Primaries? Bruh. If you plan doesn’t have a 3 month timeframe it’s not a plan.
Strategy versus tactics. Strategy verse tactics. You need both.
Banking on a scenario that isn’t in the current timeline is neither.
Spoken like a Neoliberal politician
Is that the “no true scot” fallacy?
Which do you think we don’t need?
The Neoliberal part obv.
Sucking the cocks of the rich will never be a winning strategy to attract a working class voters, the interests of the voters Democrats take for granted are fundementally at odds with the interests of their doners.
So your strategy is to convince the 35% of the population who vote Democrat like it’s their sports team to change their minds, and then the centrists from both sides as well?
Do you see why that’s not a winning approach?
I love the rage. Keep that. Is the impotence you need to learn to part with. If you can’t use all the tools at your disposal to win, then you choose to lose and you’re no better than the fascists.
Neoliberals do not offer a viable path twoards democracy anymore.
Go whine at someone who cares
Do then what’s your alternative strategy? If you’ve got a possible one, I’m all in.