On August 17, the beloved Western experience Red Dead Redemption and its horror companion Undead Nightmare arrive together for the first time on the Nintendo Switch and modern PlayStation systems.

  • @kingshrubb
    link
    English
    169 months ago

    Can the switch even handle the graphics? I guess somehow It can.

    • kbity
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      The undocked Switch is in the same ballpark for raw power as the 360 and PS3, so as long as they’ve managed to sufficiently unfuck the game’s nightmare spaghetti code, should be just fine.

    • Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The Switch is faster than a PS3/360, which the original game ran on.

      To summarize, unoptimized PS3 < 360 < optimized PS3 < WiiU (slightly slower cpu then previous, faster GPU) < Switch in terms of devices with a roughly similar performamce level.

    • FartsWithAnAccent
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      The Switch has pretty underwhelming specs but this is a PS2 game isn’t it?

      • hoodatninja
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        360/PS3. Switch will struggle for sure. It’ll probably be 30fps @720p with either slightly lower res or unstable framerate.

      • PenguinJuice
        link
        fedilink
        -79 months ago

        I hate playing games on the switch. Tbh I dislike the switch. Whenever games only come out for the switch it bums me out. Could be playing the game on PC with modern tech but nah. Locked to an underwhelming tablet with controllers

        • @Nutteman
          link
          English
          99 months ago

          My brother in christ, do us all a favor and look into switch emulation already so we don’t ever have to see such an asinine comment again. If your computer is good enough you can run switch games at a wayyyyy better performance than the switch itself can.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Just emulate it if you want to play switch games “on PC with modern tech.” For legal reasons I’d advocate getting a modded switch and ripping your own games if you go that route but I was playing Tears of the Kingdom in 1440p ultra wide 60fps day 1.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    139 months ago

    Never played this one, only the second. I especially liked the slow and deliberate style and pacing of RDR 2, something a lot of people found off putting. Is this game similar? I guess my question is: If I liked the gameplay of the second game will I enjoy the first?

    • @lamebox
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Both are equally stellar. 1 plays like a typical spaghetti western while 2 plays like a western drama of sorts, so you’ll find the tone a bit off-putting at first and the story doesn’t carry a lot of the heft that 2 did. Mechanics such as Honor play almost no role in the story so it’s a more linear experience, too.

      When it comes to gameplay, you’ll most definitely enjoy 1. I’d say the first game plays a bit better; the controls are more streamlined, and I found myself making a lot of mistakes when it came to 2’s weird interaction menus and such, so it’s a nice change of pace. Aspects such as hunting and side stories are naturally not as fleshed out, but that’s up to personal preference. They’re still pretty good and engaging.

      If you ever wanted to pick up RDR1, now’s a great time. We long heard stories of how hellish the development of the game was, so it being available on modern systems is a great achievement. We have yet to see how it would perform on the Switch however.

    • @TORFdot0
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      I would say that the gameplay is a more simplified version of red dead 2. The base mechanics are mostly the same but red dead 2 adds more depth. In some ways I prefer the gameplay in red dead 1 as it’s simple to understand health, stamina, and dead eye work without having to bother with “cores” (there are no cores in red dead 1)

      Eating and medicine is simply for restoring health, deadeye is refilled by getting head shots. No gun maintenance or inventory management needed in the first game.

      The story is a bit more focused in the first game as well instead of strung out into chapters.

    • Synthaxx
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      The funny thing is that chronologically RDR 1 is set after RDR 2.

      That being said, you’ll probably enjoy this one too.

      • Dudewitbow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        RDR1 has already been playable on Xenia for quite some time. (And the emulator your thinking of is Yuzu/Ryujinx, Cemu is a wiiu emulator)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        Oh man… Choosing games is really becoming tough lately! Busy with TOTK after I am done I plan on buying Hogwarts Legacy assuming it still launches on time. Also want to play Witcher 3 - been toying with this in my mind for some time now. Oh well maybe I’ll just buy all three…

  • @dessel
    link
    English
    39 months ago

    Nice. I love to see so many 360/PS3 era games come to switch. Hope for Oblivion or FO3 to get released

  • @_finger_
    link
    English
    39 months ago

    Instant buy, been waiting to revisit this game. Surprised it even runs in Switch

  • @Narann
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    While I’m excited, I will definitely wait for reviews. Rockstar is not the most trusted company.