• Flying Squid
    link
    841 year ago

    For years, right wingers have told people who got arrested for minor offenses that claimed they didn’t know it was illegal that, “ignorance of the law is no excuse.”

    Now suddenly it’s an excuse.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        591 year ago

        Yes, but I already said ‘right wingers’ and I didn’t want to repeat myself.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      271 year ago

      It already worked for Jr when they decided he was too dumb to collude with Russia.

      • chaogomu
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        Ah, the Mueller report, where Mueller wrote that there was so much obstruction that he couldn’t do his job, and the Republicans and Fox then screamed “see, no collusion found”.

        • @SheeEttin
          link
          English
          111 year ago

          If you don’t look for it, it doesn’t exist. It works for crime, it works for COVID, it works for everything!

  • Thales
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    All four charges laid out in the second federal indictment of former President Donald Trump center around the idea that Trump tried to steal the 2020 election. Hence, some people incorrectly believe that part of the prosecution’s job will be showing that Trump understood that he was the one trying to steal the election, and not that it was stolen from him. Those people are mistaken. Special counsel Jack Smith can convict Trump on all charges — corruptly obstructing and conspiring to corrupt an official proceeding, conspiring to defraud the government, and conspiring to violate civil rights — without ever showing that Trump knew he had lost the 2020 election.

    I’m liking Jack Smith more-and-more everyday.

    • @PsychedSy
      link
      31 year ago

      You can show him something and have him deny it moments later and there’s no way of divining if he’s lying, a moron, that fucking narcissistic or all of the above.

    • @bgrfrtwnr
      link
      21 year ago

      Sadly, that isn’t how it works. The prosecution always has the burden of proof. The accused is presumed innocent.

      Let’s not go crazy and act like things are different just because cheeto man is a douche canoe and we want to see him rot in jail.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On the other hand, we can’t just allow “I didn’t know” or “I can’t remember” to be a universal get-out-of-jail-free card, or anybody could get out of anything with this One Weird Trick. Can you imagine someone getting out of a murder charge by claiming they didn’t know the thing in their hand was a gun? (Oh wait, that actually happened, more or less. Not sure how that affects my argument, though.)