Title text: If that doesn’t fix it, git.txt contains the phone number of a friend of mine who understands git. Just wait through a few minutes of ‘It’s really pretty simple, just think of branches as…’ and eventually you’ll learn the commands that will fix everything.


Transcript

[Cueball points to a computer on a desk while Ponytail and Hairy are standing further away behind an office chair.]

Cueball: This is git. It tracks collaborative work on projects through a beautiful distributed graph theory tree model.
Ponytail: Cool. How do we use it?
Cueball: No idea. Just memorize these shell commands and type them to sync up. If you get errors, save your work elsewhere, delete the project, and download a fresh copy.


      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        I’ve been using git for 10+ years and still sometimes do this. I know I could fix it, I also pretty much know what to do to fix it. However nuking the thing from orbit and restarting takes like 30 secs, so it’s never worth fixing.

  • Bilbo Baggins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    Git is something that is very comfortable to use after a year or two, but when you initially start using it, it is just so easy to mess things up in ways that are unrecoverable. I remember the silly days when I’d back up all my changes first before using git since I would so regularly lose everything through a combination of git commands.

    It’s easy for me now, but the initial stages punish mistakes severely. It’s the dark souls of source control, except it’s not really fun. It’s just a very beginner unfriendly tool.

  • @Gxost
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    A good GUI can solve most problems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      If my colleagues mess something up in their fancy GUIs, they come to me to fix it in the terminal.

      • @Gxost
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        My experience is the opposite. A colleague who uses SourceTree and git console (for use cases not covered by SourceTree) asked me a few times to fix his branches when something went wrong (after using git console). I easily fixed it using SmartGit (paid software).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is there a really good free Git GUI for Linux? I have tried a bunch of them but all the good ones seem to be closed source and paid.

      • @aliceblossom
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        I like SourceTree and it’s free. I don’t use it all the time, but if I’ve made a bunch of changes debugging something and I want to easily discard all of the debugging-only changes, the UI makes it really easy to commit or discard individual lines from the changeset.

        Additionally, I set up an alias to open it from the command line (stree) and have it show whatever git directory I opened it from.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Will it run on Linux? I use Sourcetree on Windows but didn’t think it was available for Linux.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Guess it’s a bit subjective what would be considered good, but personally I like gitk. It’s good enough for me at least.

      • @fury
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Gittyup, a fork of GitAhead, is my favorite.

  • freamon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I literally did this yesterday.

    I’ve since found chats with Bing are surprisingly informative.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m using Mercurial for the last 2 years at current company, before that it was 5-7 years of Git on various jobs. It’s so much better if you use it correctly (no long-living or big branches). I forgot what hell Git was sometimes.

    • key
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I miss mercurial so much. Such a better UX.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I have used Mercurial at work for years, and Git for side projects. I screw up far less often in Mercurial, and its tools are easy to use. It’s strange how thoroughly Git took over.

      • @shastaxc
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        It’s not that strange. Microsoft owns GitHub.

    • JoYo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I used hg until python switched to git.

      if python isn’t going to bother them the battle is lost.

  • @1050053
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    It’s all fun and games until your colleague has to pull a PR branch… using fast-forward.

    • @kameecoding
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      just rebase your fucking PR so I don’t have to deal with it, thank you.