• @ytsedude
    link
    761 year ago

    Well, this is terrifying. The experience of slowly becoming not only a “product” but almost an “enemy of the state” has been surreal and disheartening to say the least.

  • Rottcodd
    link
    fedilink
    711 year ago

    Of course they are.

    A pertinent point that Solzhenitsyn made in Gulag Archipelago - he said that in all the time he spent in the gulags, he never once met a person who had not been legitimately convicted of a genuine crime.

    The way it worked was simply that the USSR had such an extensive and nebulous set of laws that it was effectively impossible for anyone to obey all of them all the time, and so much information on all its citizens that whenever an official wanted someone disappeared, it was just a matter of checking through their records and finding which law(s) they had broken, then arresting them, trying them and convicting them.

    The US oligarchy is actively pursuing the same basic strategy, and for the same basic reasons.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Just my tin-foil hat opinion, but if anyone thinks the US is not heading towards a surveillance State on par with China, then I have a bridge to sell you.

    • @Leminator
      link
      121 year ago

      I’m guessing virtually every government in the world is surveilling and collecting data on as many people as they can. I don’t think that’s tinfoil at all but actually a part of the job of modern intelligence. The only (sorta) counterbalance citizens have is the concept of citizen’s rights (including privacy), which may legally barely exist (if at all) in other countries.

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      121 year ago

      I don’t think that’s a tin-foil hat opinion.

    • @4lan
      link
      71 year ago

      In Virginia you now have to show your government ID to view a porn site. Welcome to the nanny state

  • @sramder
    link
    331 year ago

    Fairly longwinded article on the US government buying data to skip on getting warrants.

    The size and scope of the government effort to accumulate data revealing the minute details of Americans’ lives are described soberly and at length by the director’s own panel of experts in a newly declassified report. Haines had first tasked her advisers in late 2021 with untangling a web of secretive business arrangements between commercial data brokers and US intelligence community members.  What that report ended up saying constitutes a nightmare scenario for privacy defenders.  “This report reveals what we feared most,” says Sean Vitka, a policy attorney at the nonprofit Demand Progress. “Intelligence agencies are flouting the law and buying information about Americans that Congress and the Supreme Court have made clear the government should not have.”  In the shadow of years of inaction by the US Congress on comprehensive privacy reform, a surveillance state has been quietly growing in the legal system’s cracks. Little deference is paid by prosecutors to the purpose or intent behind limits traditionally imposed on domestic surveillance activities. More craven interpretations of aging laws are widely used to ignore them. As the framework guarding what privacy Americans do have grows increasingly frail, opportunities abound to split hairs in court over whether such rights are even enjoyed by our digital counterparts. “I’ve been warning for years that if using a credit card to buy an American’s personal information voids their Fourth Amendment rights, then traditional checks and balances for government surveillance will crumble,” Ron Wyden, a US senator from Oregon, says. 

  • @MiddleWeigh
    link
    30
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s already extremely easy for LE to drum up basically whatever charge and stick it to you, for the majority of citizens with no funds for a lawyer.

    We’ve already got the plate scanners. Everytime I drive by one, my file pops as a red flag and a stop is more than likely, just to “check in” with me, usually with some false pretense like “i thought your window was cracked, my bad, but where you going tonight?” I’m not technically on paper, but I am treated as such. Easy arrest potential with some bs probable cause.

    The fact that it will continue to go further doesn’t surprise me. Makes the job even easier for them. If you aren’t a good consumer, you will be prosecuted.

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s the modern day equivalent of “you’re not from around here.”

  • TheRazorX
    link
    fedilink
    281 year ago

    The hilarious part (in a bleak fashion), is I can’t find many other articles discussing this.

    Then everyone will panic and go crazy when someone like Trump wins and they have access to all this. History repeats.

    • Dee
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      I can’t find many other articles discussing this.

      We’ve known they’ve been doing this since at least Snowden, what’s the story?

      Remember that government agency that hoovers up all our data? Yeah, they’re still doing that. Only they don’t have to try as hard because they can just buy our info instead of snooping for it (but they’re also still snooping).

      Maybe it’s good to remind people it’s still happening because apparently everyone forgot we were told they’ve been doing this, for a while.

      • @hark
        link
        41 year ago

        What really blows my mind are the people who attack Snowden while claiming this mass data collection is perfectly fine.

        • TheRazorX
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I love the “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide…”

          I usually respond to those folks with “Can I watch you fuck your spouse? You’re not doing anything wrong, they’re your spouse, so you shouldn’t have anything to hide”

          The crazy part is, I’ve gotten a few enthusiastic “Yes” responses to that…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yes and no - prism and related programs weren’t that big a deal (besides morally and legally) - the NSA was collecting far more data than they could use at scale. It was a problem, but realistically it wouldn’t affect normal people - you’d have to catch a lot of attention first to even be searched in that system. It couldn’t be used for law enforcement or anything wide scale - the collection was there, but the analysis didn’t scale

        It was a problem because of where we are now - AI advancement means not only can they now process the insane amount of data they ingest and make terrifying associations, they can use the ridiculous amount of compute they’ve been building out to actually use all this data

        We’re most of the way down the slippery slope now, and still accelerating fast. The capability makes 1984 look quaint, and having the ability to flick on systems China drools over is pretty concerning

        People don’t even know they’re trying to make us use id to use sites “to protect the children”. Any site that might be inappropriate (of which, social media fits under the current definitions of) would be responsible for children getting access to their services - storing driver’s licenses seems to be the popular idea for compliance. Google’s web DRM might be pushed out so fast to offer this kind of service too

        Kosa has bipartisan support, the president has come out strongly supporting it, and it’s insane to me that people still don’t care

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Nobody forgot. We all depend on the internet for daily life and livelihoods. We are largely powerless against these faceless institutions

        • Dee
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Not that I disagree with you, but I was more responding to the fact that they said they can’t find anybody else reporting about it. I was saying that there’s not much to report because this is kind of old news. I understand why more news agencies aren’t picking up on this, like, government agencies known for sucking up data are still sucking up data. -shrug-

          • TheRazorX
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I don’t disagree, and you’re absolutely right, but i’d argue there’s still a difference between a government organization collecting the data themselves, and the same organization buying it from other brokers. It’s semantics sure, but it’s a new dimension of this fucketry.

      • @eldavi
        link
        21 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Dee
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          people chose to forget so that they don’t have to change their world view.

          That’s a good point, as a Sys Admin I’ve ran into a few coworkers like that myself. Not sure how somebody could deny it at this point tbh though.

      • @mithbt
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We’ve known they’ve been doing this since at least Snowden, what’s the story?

        They’ve been doing this since the 1950s, younger generations just didn’t realize the scope until Snowden.

        • Dee
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah, that’s why I said “at least” because I’m sure there’s earlier examples but that was the largest recent example.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes and no - prism and related programs weren’t that big a deal (besides morally and legally) - the NSA was collecting far more data than they could use at scale. It was a problem, but realistically it wouldn’t affect normal people - you’d have to catch a lot of attention first to even be searched in that system. It couldn’t be used for law enforcement or anything wide scale - the collection was there, but the analysis didn’t scale

        It was a problem because of where we are now - AI advancement means not only can they now process the insane amount of data they ingest and make terrifying associations, they can use the ridiculous amount of compute they’ve been building out to actually use all this data

        We’re most of the way down the slippery slope now, and still accelerating fast. The capability makes 1984 look quaint, and having the ability to flick on systems China drools over is pretty concerning

        People don’t even know they’re trying to make us use id to use sites “to protect the children”. Any site that might be inappropriate (of which, social media fits under the current definitions of) would be responsible for children getting access to their services - storing driver’s licenses seems to be the popular idea for compliance. Google’s web DRM might be pushed out so fast to offer this kind of service too

        Kosa has bipartisan support, the president has come out strongly supporting it, and it’s insane to me that people still don’t care

    • @TheJims
      link
      41 year ago

      Or imagine if they were to ever get hacked.

  • GodlessCommie
    link
    221 year ago

    I requested my data file from Lexis/Nexus several years ago, and the amount of personal data scraped from EVERYWHERE online was in it. AOL chat convos from the 90s, old, used once, throw away email addresses, pictures shared on social media. The damn thing was several inches thick and arrived in a box. We have zero privacy

    • throwaway
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Why lie about this?

      LexisNexis specializes in law (the Lexis end) and news (the Nexis end)—the data they procure and collate.

      Their identity verification product, Accurint, accesses public record sources, and is imperative to keep pure. Inclusion of any private record data is a massive legal concern and actively monitored for.

      You don’t run a law service outfit without Legal being all up in your butt, and boy, were they.

      Source: I was responsible for testing deliverables across all LN products.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How exactly does one do that?

      Edit: nvm I found the portal. I’m intrigued but I don’t know what I would do with mountains of porn urls.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          You all might as well become my enemies now before I post 6000 links to Wikipedia, 3000 IMDb links, 200k defunct porn links, and 200 live links to YouTube shorts.

      • @TokenBoomerOP
        link
        21 year ago

        That’s it! I’m going off the grid.

          • @TokenBoomerOP
            link
            11 year ago

            Did you hear something? I don’t get cell service in the Great White North.

            • @lemmefixdat4u
              link
              11 year ago

              One of the concerns about Starlink’s satellite constellation is the ability to locate a single powered cellphone anywhere on the planet, even when you have GPS off. That they already have this ability means cellular trackers also work anywhere on the planet for those who have the right access.

              • @TokenBoomerOP
                link
                21 year ago

                U mean they can track my jitterbug?

      • @eldavi
        link
        21 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • @twistypencil
    link
    161 year ago

    Fwiw, this article is from June, but it did not receive enough attention, so I’m glad it’s coming back

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      131 year ago

      This, and climate change, will define this era. Surveillance makes fascism so much easier.

      • @twistypencil
        link
        51 year ago

        100% the only difference is surveillance hides in the shadows and it’s easy for people to not see the effects, whereas the effects of climate change cannot be hidden. So surveillance feels way more nefarious, and climate change feels more honest about the pain is going to inflict on us

    • @hglman
      link
      61 year ago

      No, it’s all ok bc money was involved.

    • flipht
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I mean, we all will. But the question is how miserable will we be until then.

      • @jantin
        link
        11 year ago

        I predict an unprecedented wave of suicides in about 10 years time. People who knew a nicer world (current 30-40 year olds) will ultimately understand how hopeless the future is. Younger people will break after 20-30 years of polarization, pauperisation and yearly disasters. This will overlap with natural timeline of passing away of today’s 60+ year olds. Not fun times ahead.

        • @tallwookie
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          eh, I think it really depends on the individual. people need to go outside more and start caring less about things they cant change.

          • @jantin
            link
            31 year ago

            huh “go for a walk, it’s gonna help with depression” is not a take I expected here

        • arefx
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Good more prospective homes for me to buy for myself to live in corporations to rent out.

  • tiredofsametab
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Well, where else would they store dirt? It’s not like you can just put it on the ground or something; on people is the only clear, reasonable choice!

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      11 year ago

      That’s what all the plastic is for, to store the dirt.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    -31 year ago

    Lol i am.not concerned at all because whoever doesn’t know about “5 eyes” should go and read about it so its just not the US.

    • @scottywh
      link
      51 year ago

      You’re not concerned because everyone does it?

      That doesn’t seem like sound logic to me.

      • YⓄ乙
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand where you coming from but as a regular doing 9-5 , I can’t change anything until and unless every other regular like you push for a change so I’ve accepted it.

        • @scottywh
          link
          21 year ago

          This reply is far more logical than your original comment.

          Laughing about oppression is sillier than just accepting it.