• @IBNobody
    link
    English
    39
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Part of me thinks that it’s not a consumer facing choice but one of cost savings. I bet they have to pay a licensing fee to continue using Denuvo.

    • @visor841
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      I think that’s exactly right. I think there is a one-time cost they could pay, but it’s a lot more, so they just didn’t bother.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      And since the objective is to “protect” release sales, taking it out a few months later makes sense.

    • Haru
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Has to be. There’s always going to be a point in a games post-release lifecycle where the cost is just not worth it anymore. Shame these decisions always seem to be based on cost and not what’s right for the consumer.

  • @rDrDr
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Glad I didn’t buy it during the summer sale. Now I can hopefully get it for less without paying the Denuvo tax.