Note: This post now archived and as such no longer works

An external image showing your user-agent and the total "hit count"

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    501 year ago

    This is possible because Lemmy doesn’t proxy external images but instead loads them directly. While not all that bad, this could be used for Spy pixels by nefarious posters and commenters.

    Note, that the only thing that I willingly log is the “hit count” visible in the image, and I have no intention to misuse the data.

  • @WhatAmLemmy
    link
    English
    311 year ago

    This is true for most link aggregators that attempt to render external content. Proxying images and videos would dramatically increase costs.

    If you care that much about anonymity, use a VPN/Tor and a browser with advanced fingerprinting resistance — tor browser, mullvad browser, or firefox with resist fingerprinting = true.

      • Oliver Lowe
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        That makes sense. But I guess there’s these questions: at what resolution? For how long? Maybe the status quo is such because it’s simpler code. The project is still relatively young. I wonder where/how we can discuss these things?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It still adds up fast especially if you run an instance that stores to s3 with a cdn. My mastodon server racked up 1k in cdn usage one month before I switched to local storage no cdn.

    • @veloxy
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This reminds me of those old forum signatures which looked like a signpost, and showed your IP address, browser, OS etc. They were pretty popular back then (when no one cared about their privacy), to the point that some folks even made parody versions of those signatures (like changing the IP to “127.0.0.1” or writing a funny message).

  • @DoctorLuv
    link
    01 year ago

    But I’m not on chrome mobile…