• Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh yeah, there’s always someone “paying” for bad reviews. Yet they can never prove it.

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    The game looks fiiiiiiiiiiine but I’m already exhausted at the thought of another $80 USD price tag with DLC/microtransactions and forced multiplayer elements.

    AAA studios are all doing the same sorts of things and putting just a little twist on it hoping it’ll be enough to persuade you away from all the other AAA games and studious out there doing the exact same thing.

    I’m not a hater, I don’t hate your mediocre looking game that absolutely fails to stand out from the crowd, but I’m not gonna buy into your advertising for it either. To anyone who finds a home in this game and enjoys it, I’m legit happy for you. Mostly I’m just never going to think about this ever again.

    • ampersandrew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mindseye is $60, and it’s much easier to stand out from the crowd when the crowd is all the way back in 2010.

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The plot is basically current day American life. You don’t need the game to play it.

    …because life is “The Game”.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    While these are former Rockstar devs, so there is some incentive by Take Two to potentially take them down, what they have shown is… Not impressive yet

    “Driving and shooting, the game.”

    Oh and you can make your own scripted driving and shooting levels

    Granted you can say the same thing about GTA technically… But the characters are not interesting and the gameplay looks… off. The ragdoll enemies and the lack of any gun recoil. Just comes off as steam asset flip quality

  • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    The game looks like a mixture of GTA, Mafia, modernize APB in a cyberpunk-esque universe with generic Unreal 5 graphics.

    The mod tool is the biggest feature in my eyes, but for the average gamer does that make a difference? I don’t think you need to pay to criticize this game, but what do I know? I been paid by Russia and China to have this account on lemmy 🤷‍♂️

  • Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is that screenshot purposely taken to make him look like henry cavill ?

    or am i imagining it ?

  • Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    There must be so much paid review manipulation out there but I don’t know if it amounts to much. At the end of the day, if the game is good people will play it. I mean No Man’s Sky came back from the entire world dumping on it from the stratosphere. Also, often overly negative reviews will actually make me more interested in a game, specially if all the negatives don’t sound that bad “Horrible game! I didn’t continuously die and how dare they allow the player to explore anywhere!”.

    • Airowird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Negative reviews usually are more descriptive about the game’s design than positive ones, because it’s a big enough part to stop someone from playing more. Positive reviews are 98% “This game gives me dopamine and/or money”

      • Novamdomum@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve tried to guess what prmart means but I just can’t imagine what you meant to type hehe can you clarify?

        • Airowird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Part

          Missed typing the a, typed r, then hit m instead of backspace.

          I blame my lack and/or overuse of coffee.

  • ampersandrew
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean, if it’s a technical mess, that’s one thing, but I think this looks great. More importantly, we really haven’t gotten many games like this in so, so long, and I’m hungry for it.

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Based on some comments in the article, it sounds like the guy is accusing Rockstar of financing a smear campaign. Maybe if they made a game that wasn’t a straight GTA clone they wouldn’t have to worry about something like that.

    • StereoCode
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wild take. Imagine if you made a souls-like game and fromsoft made a smear campaign against you? Assuming this accusation has any legs. It’s highly morally corrupt to just be “don’t make a souls game then”. Most games can be compared to another existing game franchise, it’s called competition.

  • justadudeingear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    it looks great. mind you im not the basic action movie kinda buff. die hards and misson imposibles are boring to me but it looks good. why they hating it and its got the dome!