I am currently using EndeavourOS for my laptop. Is there a backup solution that is easy to use, and can be run from the EndeavourOS install media without internet? (RSync is included, but no other backup tools are included, to my knowledge.) I don’t want to use another ISO due to space constraints on my USB.

  • @ikidd
    link
    261 year ago

    Borg backup. You should be able to install it on your Live session, then restore to the target mount point.

    • @captainfeeny
      link
      71 year ago

      And use Vorta if you want a gui for Borg backup.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Pika Backup is the most user-friendly GUI for Borg. Vorta UI is powerful but complex. Pika only shows you the absolute basics: where to keep the backups, what to include, what to exclude, list of snapshots, and schedule options.

      • @ikidd
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Vorta looks very powerful. I know all that functionality is in Borg, but it’s tricky to do it right. I’ll give Vorta a try on my next install.

    • Quazatron
      link
      31 year ago

      BorgBackup is the answer. Stopped creating stupid shell scripts with rsync and whatever and thinking I was so clever.

      • @ikidd
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As long as you don’t reboot, your live sessions act like a fully installed OS. At least with any of the LiveUSB sessions I’ve ever used over the last decade.

        You can install, mount a backup image, then push it on to a mountpoint for your actual install to be restored.

      • @lynny
        link
        31 year ago

        Technically you are able to to do with any live environment and backup data, so the answer would be “yes”.

  • Minty95
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Timeshift. Easy to set up. Easy to use, only takes a couple of minutes to ‘re-set’ your system back, if you break it. If you want just to backup files, documents etc then Cron. I use both. They are standard Linux programs and easy to use

  • @lynny
    link
    71 year ago

    Restic is my favorite, but you really would need to be familiar with the terminal, cron tasks, etc. to consider it a viable option.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Have you looked to see if rdiff-backup is included? It works off of rsync but provides incremental backups and restores. On my servers I set up a script that excludes system folders like /dev, network mounts, and the log files, but it grabs pretty much everything else. Once the script works just set up a cron job and forget about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I don’t want to use another ISO due to space constraints on my USB.

    What? A 32GB thumb drive is under $10…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Sounds like a well thought out solution, but we need proper programs which can handle backups, like some mentioned in this thread.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Its not about features, its about “duct tape scripts” are rarely a solution for anybody else than the author, imo. Borgbackup seems like the proper suggestion here for the OP.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I tried Backintime and Timeshift recently.

      In Backintime I added the dirs I wanted to backup and where to make the backups, pressed “run” and it said there’s nothing to do. Uninstalled. Later on I found out it had added stuff to my crontab even though I never asked it for a recurring schedule.

      Timeshift started by asking for the root password right off the bat. Uninstalled. Like, I know it will want root access eventually but at least buy me dinner first. How do I know what a program I’ve never used before wants to do to my system?

    • Atemu
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Neither of those are backup tools. They’re snapshotting tools.

        • Atemu
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          They are often incremental but they’re still not a backup.

          They are local restore points. That’s better than nothing at all as a local copy can protect against a very limited kind of data hazard and quite handy indeed but not a backup. A backup is always an independent copy.

          If your entire machine was to blow up, a backup must be able to retain your data. A copy on the same disks will not.

          • Dataprolet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Now I get your point, sorry. You can use both Timeshift and BackInTime as snapshot tools, but also configure them to create snapshots on a different drive, making it an actual backup.

            I for example use Timeshift in Rsync mode for that reason even though I’m also using Btrfs, which Timeshift supports, but only for non-backup snapshots.

            Sorry for the confusion, I guess when suggesting both those tools one always has to specify that you need to save snapshots on a secondary drive for it to be a backup.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I use backintime and have for a number of years. It is incremental with unchanged files being hard-linked and makes it easy to restore files if needed.

  • dbx12
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Not a recommendation per se, but you can use any backup software as long as you can edit your live iso. For example puting the restic binary into /opt

  • @nottelling
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    I’d imagine tar is included with the install media.

  • @mvirts
    link
    11 year ago

    Testdisk 😹 jk don’t be like me