Hubzilla 10.4.1
- Fix regression in pubstream tag view
- Fix photos meta data not updated when renaming folder in files app
- Fix syntax error in custom emoji sample code
- Fix rendering issue when image load event triggered after timeout
- Fix comment preview not always displayed
- Fix new created comment rendering offscreen
- Update derived theme tutorial and add it to the help index
- Add ‘extends’ attribute to theme info
- Fix reply modal remaining hidden after reactions loaded
- Refactor tagcloud to use smarty template file
- Fix regression in tagadelic
- Fix possible performance issue with archive widget
- Fix various addons which still used the deprecated $a global

#Hubzilla

CC: @Fediverse News

      • *_jߍyrope@hub.kliklak.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Mario Vavti Easy, that i stop supporting a post, that i supported before, because later on i had a 2nd thought. Btw i am no special person there, people change their mind all the time.

        • Mario Vavti@hub.somaton.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @*_jayrope yes, of course you have your intention. But those do not tell us what the consequences of your intention should be.
          Basically you have pushed 3rd party content into your connections stream. If you revoke your announce activity, the content will be still in their stream and they will not know why. Now you might say “remove the content too”. But that would be kind of rude. Maybe they found it interesting, maybe they even engaged with it already etc. That is why undo announce is not implemented yet.

          • *_jߍyrope@hub.kliklak.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            @Mario Vavti I can’t see your point. This would mean, that people engaging upon a recommendation are also acting weirdly. I can’t see neither of those issues, and i think, that the whole is just one of comm being fluid, neither fully controllable nor judgeable. What matters to me, is that i could publicly (or not) withdraw a consent or even endorsement which i had given before to some content and their author(s).
            What others make of either action is their own story, not mine.

              • *_jߍyrope@hub.kliklak.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                @Mario Vavti Let’s use an example. Someone posts a thread, i like the initial post, i am boosting it, so that more can engage in that discussion. The whole thing later on turns into sthg. nasty, there’s many options, flame wars, anti-human stuff, what-have-you.
                And so finally I’d like to take my repeat/boost away not to lure more people into this mess. But then i can’t. I can with a like, why not with a repeat/boost?

                • Mario Vavti@hub.somaton.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  @*_jayrope

                  I can with a like, why not with a repeat/boost?

                  I have explained the problem above already. A repeat or boost will push 3rd party content to your connections. A like does not do that. That is the main difference.

  • I don’t know if this is a good analogy or not, but it sounds like forwarding an email to an email distribution list and then wanting to unforward it 3 days later. That would involve reaching out and deleting email from other people’s inboxes.