I start: the most important thing is not the desktop, it’s the package manager.

  • Tom
    link
    891 year ago

    That after getting used to Linux I will hate to be forced to use less free operating systems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I could but I always get a feeling like I’m being monitored constantly. Like imagine being at work and if you don’t move your mouse for a few minutes you’d get a warning or something. Or remember using a computer at school where the teacher could literally see the screen of every student, yeah like that.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Used to use gedit, the found nano and it was awesome. Then found Vim… I RAN back to nano haha

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Try micro.

        It’s much better and quite easy if not easier to use than nano. It should really be the default simple editor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I hear you 😁. For whatever reason I stuck with the Vim tutorial and did it a few times over the years. Now I’m using the IdeaVIM extension in IntelliJ - that mode system is just sooo powerful. It has a horrible learning curve, yes, but if you manage to stick with it, it pays huge dividends. I probably know, like, 18% of all commands, and it completely changed how I edit files (mostly for coding, but also text).

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Alright alright. You win haha seriously, you’ve convinced me to give vim another chance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Use vimtutor. It comes with vim and teaches you to the basic vim commands from within vim.

            And don’t worry about exiting vim, that’s lesson 1.2 :)

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Hahaha!!! I actually know how to exit Vim. Had to learn it when setting up a server config on a server that only had Vim installed. Once set up, nano got installed.

              This vimtutor looks pretty awesome, and I can’t wait to get learning on it. In all honesty, vim does looks super helpful. It’s just that I usually use text editors to quickly setup configs, when gui won’t do or I’m just done with gui for the moment. During those times, my patience is usually low, and searching how to save or quit or open or do any other basic functionality, reduces that patience further. But vimtutor makes it a point to learn vim when I’m not trying to get in, get it done, and get out. This may work for me. I may actually learn vim!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I remember, back in the day, I asked on IRC how to edit a file in Linux. Someone said vi. Little did I know that in chat someone said, the next question is how do I quit. I asked that exact question. Yes chat erupted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I vaguely remember pressing Alt+F4 while trying to close vim in a terminal once. It did switch to me login prompt so I thought it worked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Either by making it segfault or you don’t.

      I got a whole software developer career going out of my attempts to exit vim.

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      For people who actually don’t know this, yet: Type :x.
      This means “eXit, save any changes”

      If you want to leave and discard your changes, type :q!
      The :q means “Quit”, without any other instructions. This will warn you if you changed anything, adding ! means “force this command”.

  • Aa!
    link
    391 year ago

    I guess the main things would be:

    • As a beginner, don’t bother trying to dual boot – If you still need a Windows box, get some cheap hardware to do your Linux work on. It’s too easy to screw up both systems otherwise.
    • Don’t get too hung up on a specific distro, the better you are at dealing with different configurations, the better prepared you will be for whatever comes. Once you’ve gotten one set up, don’t be afraid to just try a different one.
    • Dandroid
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      I never had a problem dual booting, even as a beginner. I always kept everything on two separate drives, though, each with their own EFI partition.

      • spez
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I kept them on the same drive, different EFI partitions.

        • @Jayb151
          link
          21 year ago

          I’ve also always done dual boot on one drive, no real problems other than when I know I caused the problem.

          Also… What’s up with that user name?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I did the opposite, have always dual booted my laptops and had win on my PC until quite recently now that I’m comfortable enough not to need a safety net anymore

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    The 1:1 windows:Linux replacement is just a means to keep you on Windows. Once you learn Linux, you’ll come to understand how much of a farce it is and how it’s designed to keep you away

  • Montagge
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    That I could put /home on a different drive
    That I would never boot into Windows again so having partitions for it was a waste of time
    That mounting drives with their uuid as the mount location is insane

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      That mounting drives with their uuid as the mount location is insane

      Why tho? Kernel sometimes can index drives in different order (if you have multiple drives), screwing your mount locations. But UUID is always the same

      • @GamingChairModel
        link
        81 year ago

        You can give your partitions labels and mount by label. Labels are persistent, like UUIDs, but are also easier to remember and copy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But why would I even try to remember them? Just look them up. Nowadays I don’t even see them since I use Gnome Disk Utility or KDE partition manager to automount them (they both just write to your /etc/fstab)

          • @GamingChairModel
            link
            11 year ago

            But why would I even try to remember them? Just look them up.

            For me, I used labels when setting up those volumes manually. Creating a LUKS container, setting up LVM groups and volumes, configuring my bootloader to decrypt the correct encrypted disk, etc. It was just easier to remember which device label was my encrypted container, which was the group, and what the different volumes were. And once the labels were made, well, I just used them.

      • Montagge
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It’s just really long is all. I wish I had given it something shorter but descriptive.

  • @Potatos_are_not_friends
    link
    301 year ago

    Trying not to make it windows.

    There’s a lot of conveniences that Windows comes default with.

    When I switched to Linux, my immediate goal was to find alternatives for EVERYTHING. That lead to being disappointed by a lot.

    Understanding Linux and also recognizing there’s a lot of shit I don’t need (that windows was giving me for the sake of VALUE) was a game changer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Understanding Linux and also recognizing there’s a lot of shit I don’t need (that windows was giving me for the sake of VALUE) was a game changer.

      This 100%! After using Linux for the past few years I’ve realized a lot of the crap windows has by default is stuffed in there to have something to market.

    • Rusty
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Nowadays there’s a lot of good alternatives for everything, including windows hello for any password prompt

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Linux is pretty easy to use nowadays. The only thing I would check before switching is driver compatibility.

  • supert
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago
    • tab completion in bash
    • vim
    • zfs
    • git (though it didn’t exist then)
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        In contrast to btrfs it doesn’t break your data. Everyone learns the hard way not to use btrfs…

        • @droans
          link
          21 year ago

          Btrfs was the best filesystem I had used up until it corrupted my data.

      • supert
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I gave up on btrfs when Icouldn’t recover from a full disk situation (years ago, may be better nwo). But zfs tooling is so good, reliable and intuitive, I’d not want to switch anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Installed distrobox on NixOS because I was worried being limited to only nixpkgs and have not touched it once lol

      Same goes for the windows VM except for the time I needed to run excel macros for work

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Worried about being limited to only the biggest selection of packages available. Does not compute.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I did on my Nix, there was a package in Nixpkgs that was outdated, so I had the opportunity to use distrobox for that, at leqst temporarily until they update the package.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Thats been a fear of mine moving to nixos. Glad to know it’ll cover most of my software needs.

        • @babeuh
          link
          21 year ago

          Here’s a graph, it should be fine for your package needs: Graph

          This is not totally accurate because nixpkgs also packages some packages that wouldn’t be in the system package manager like Python and Haskell packages. Excluding those it’s pretty much the same as the AUR

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Am I reading the readme correctly in that I can run apt-get within distrobox on Fedora, and not be limited to dnf packages?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      By the time you’ve dressed out an Rpi to be halfway usable, you’ve spent about as much as a decent NUC. And all you have to show for it is a slow-as-mud sd card, hardly any video acceleration, a USB stack that only crashes sometimes, a busy OOM killer, and no software.

      Get an N95 based nuc. A Beelink with 8/256 runs about $150, and it just works. (Well, you might need pcie_aspm=off).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    It was ~20 years ago so my advice to myself then would be pretty irrelevant now. I messed up my laptop, and my advice then would have been don’t start with a laptop (because laptop compatibility was lacking back then compared to desktop, different times).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Laptop compatibility still sucks at times, especially with weird configurations of amd apu and nvidia gpu laptops… or maybe it’s just my skill issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Skill issue

        Nah but seriously Nvidia loves to make it difficult and Linux doesn’t make it any easier. It’s like an unstoppable force meets an unmoving object

  • guillermohs9
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Unmounting removable drives after writing to then is crucially more important than on Windows

      • guillermohs9
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        On Windows, I often simply took out the USB drive without “safely removing” it. The data was there 99% of the time. On Linux, if I’m not mistaken, unmounting the drive before disconnecting is what actually writes data to it.

        • @patatahooligan
          link
          101 year ago

          I don’t think Linux literally waits for you to unmount the drive before it decides to write to it. It looks like that because the buffering is completely hidden from the user.

          For example say you want to transfer a few GB from your SSD to a slow USB drive. Let’s say:

          • it takes about half a minute to read the data from the SSD
          • it takes ten minutes to write it to the USB
          • the data fits in the spare room you have in RAM at the moment

          In this scenario, the kernel will take half a minute to read the data into the RAM and then report that the file transfer is complete. Whatever program is being used will also report to the user that the transfer is complete. The kernel should have already started writing to the drive as soon as the data started being read into the RAM, so it should take another nine and a half minutes to complete the transfer in the background.

          So if you unmount at that point, you will have to wait nine and a half minutes. But if you leave it running and try to unmount ten minutes later it should be close to instant. That’s because the kernel kept on writing in the background and was not waiting for you to unmount the drive in order to commit the writes.

          I’m not sure but I think on Windows the file manager is aware of the buffering so this doesn’t happen, at least not for so long. But I think you can still end up with corrupted files if you don’t safely remove it.

        • @MooseBoys
          link
          41 year ago

          Or just sync before pulling it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Really? I’ve literally never done this but I suppose I really only use my USB for dd’ing a distro.