• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That means at least half the people who live in those properties won’t be able to own a motor car and I think it’s a basic thing that people expect particularly living in town.

    Emphasis added.

    Absolute carbrain. What the fuck is the matter with people.

  • Hawke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, I was going to joke about “a chicken in every pot, a parking spot for every home”

    But it turns out that that is basically what the original slogan was about completed with “…and a car in every backyard, to boot.“ Conflating progress and prosperity with car-centrism and businesss interests… turns out it’s been there the whole time.

  • mjr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Has nobody shown the government of Jersey any Strong Towns or City Beautiful videos explaining the damage done by parking minimums?

  • grueOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    The title came pre-editorialized by OP of the thread I cross-posted from, LOL. I love to see folks outside of urbanist spaces starting to get it.

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    And in the news at 10: British bean-looking fellow is wrong about things.

  • ZkhqrD5o
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is incredibly stupid. It will drive up the cost for housing

    • ZkhqrD5o
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is incredibly stupid. It will drive up the cost for housing