• Fredselfish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sucks that we couldn’t of had that from the beginning, and instead they went for gas instead.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      As far as I know, the lead acid batteries would only be usable for around 500 charge cycles, with the slowly degrading range that comes with the falling capacity.

      • Fredselfish
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure but if they had invested in that route, I’m sure we would have gotten better battery technology lot sooner. If I read correctly we had solar power back further then that.

        • jacksilver
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not sure the materials science was there. Sometimes things don’t catch on because it’s just not feasible with the technology we have at the time.

          For example, a lot of scientists during the Renaissance created machines that would eventually be feasible, but just couldn’t be made at the time.

          Example: da-vinci flying machine

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      battery tech back then would have made that car a short commute vehicle.

      really wonder its range and charge times.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          imagining urban design if we only had those electric cars.

          probably still shitty, and car centric. however, long range travel still would rely on trains.