Tesla is reportedly under investigation by the DOJ and SEC over it’s mysterious ‘Project 42’::The project was internally believed to involve building a glass house for Elon Musk, the Journal previously reported.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    751 year ago

    When I read the headline I assumed that glass house was a technical term for some financial bullshit but no. He is just building a house with a lot of glass in it. Using company funds to build a private house is almost vanilla when it comes to musk.

    • @T156
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      I thought it was a satirical article about how the companies kept him away from business operations by putting him in a glass house, where he could throw stones from.

    • @UPGRAYEDD
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      Netflix’s glass onion may end up a prediction on the level of Idiocracy

    • @Heisme
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      You know what they say, people in glass houses sink sh-sh-ships.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I thought Edward Norton was just meant to be a Musk-like Billionaire narcissist, but I didn’t realize Musk was actually trying to get to that level.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Tesla is facing scrutiny over its mysterious “Project 42” that was believed internally to involve building a glass house for Elon Musk, according to a recent report from The Wall Street Journal.

    The publication said, citing people familiar with the issue, that federal prosecutors are investigating whether Tesla used its own funds for Musk’s personal use, and is looking into how much the company has spent on the initiative, as well as its purpose.

    The US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York issued subpoenas to multiple current and ex-Tesla employees, some of which have been asked to appear in court in September, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday.

    The project appeared to be for a “dramatic glass-walled building” and concept plans showed differing designs and features, but included residential elements like bedrooms, according to the report.

    At the time, the internal inquiry into the order had targeted Omead Afshar, an executive leading Tesla’s Texas factory, Bloomberg reported last year.

    On Wednesday, the publication reported that federal prosecutors were seeking information related to internal communications with Afshar, who was said to be involved in purchasing the construction materials.


    The original article contains 457 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @coffeebiscuit
    link
    English
    211 year ago

    Probably a reference to the “Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I would believe it but this is Elon and its absolutely a 420 reference. Somewhere there is a blueprint that says 42.0 because it’s the first draft.

      • @shotgun_crab
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        420 is just the answer to everything times ten

    • @FordBeeblebrox
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      I hope not, don’t need that fuckwit associated with the Guide in any way in my head. He is a most unhoopy frood.

      • @GenesisJones
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I have bad news for you. He names stuff after cult shit.

    • Random_Character_A
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      So he’s gonna infect every X users phone with malware to create a massive cloud computing brain?

      • @AA5B
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        That’s why Apple is dropping support for iPhone X in two weeks

    • @nrezcm
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Doubt they would even be able to make a proper boat what with all the panel gaps they’re known for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I think it is drummed up crap to make a publicity, but what do I know (or care, I shouldn’t have engaged even).

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s probably a live/work space experiment born from all the times Elon slept under his desk. He wants offices with dorms so people don’t need to go home and have lives.

    • @fapforce5
      link
      English
      461 year ago

      I don’t know, but my best guess would be either it’s a publicly traded company and needs to disclose how it spends its money, or that taxes weren’t paid for the personal use funds

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        Got it in two. Both, per the article:

        It can be illegal to use company funds for personal expenses — especially when dealing with a publicly traded company. If a public company were found to have used company funds for an executive’s personal use it could lead to an IRS investigation and lawsuits from shareholders.

        Elon doesn’t own all of Tesla. It’s a publicly traded company whose shares are held by millions(?) of people. The board and CEO are generally required to act in those owners’ best interests, not their own. They have leeway, but building the CEO a house is a lot closer to embezzlement (taking company funds for personal gain) than say a PR stunt. Board/CEO remuneration is fairly carefully controlled to avoid this kind of thing.

        As for tax, it looks like the US is a bit more lax with fringe benefit tax than other jurisdictions, but it could nonetheless apply.

        • @Dntshoot
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          So if he were to give himself a bonus and use that money to build the house would it still be illegal? Genuinely asking

          • @dm_me_your_feet
            link
            English
            111 year ago

            No CEO of a public company has the power to just “give himself a bonus” if the sum is to be any more than pocket money. The board has to approve it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            The board would need to approve of that bonus, and in turn the board is accountable to shareholders. If a CEO starts using a public company as a personal piggy bank, shareholders have grounds to sue.

    • @suction
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      So you didn’t read it