Gov. Gretchen Whitmer called on Michigan lawmakers Wednesday to give all workers in the state “breathing room” by creating a new program to offer them paid family and medical leave, a proposal that some worry could amount to a tax on Michigan’s businesses and workers.

Whitmer, a Democrat who is increasingly gaining national political attention, made guaranteed paid time off for workers after the birth of a child or for health reasons a key policy priority in a speech about her legislative goals for the remainder of 2023.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Should be national. Tax the rich at a higher rate, close the loopholes.

      Sadly, that will likely never happen.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          With all the gerrymandering and court-packing going on, I’m not so sure.

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            They said the same thing about michigan two years ago. And look at them now

            Edit: And wisconsin is about to be fixed as well

            • TinyPizza@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Michigan only changed due to a citizens ballot initiative that created a independent board to redistrict the state. Not every state has that mechanism. I also wouldn’t characterize either the Governor or a large portion of our Dems as progressives, though they certainly do love to use language that leads many to think that.

          • markr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            So not voting will change that?

            • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              My thought process has always been: “Well, it may not do anything, but at least I can say I tried.”

              I am also apathetic about current events and the direction our entire world seems to be going down, but I will at least try to put in the minimum effort to make this shitty place just a little bit more bearable for the next generation.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I hope they do. I’m just not optimistic with the way Republicans have rigged everything that we’ll see the wealthy pay more taxes and the tax loopholes closed on a national level.

              • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                The other issue is a regular joe can’t bankroll their own run. But hopefully it is less expensive at the local level.

        • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Lol, which progressive? AOC? Bernie? Both are jokes. Nobody in the ‘squad’ even has principles anymore except maybe Ilhan.

  • markr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Could Joe Biden just step aside and let her run instead? Please?

    • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s a a few governors that would do well as president, but I’d like to keep them in their current position for a while so they can clean up their states before moving on to run for president. The president, while powerful, can’t do much with a largely divided legislature.

      Currently, these governors are doing so much good because in the last election, they were able to build a state government that largely wants to actually help the state and fix problems. If they didn’t have the support of the other branches, they’d just be trying to “compromise” over and over and never actually achieving anything.

    • cowfodder@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a resident of Michigan I selfishly don’t want to let her go, but the way she’s doing things I fully expect her to run in 2028. I think she’d be a fantastic president!

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    NY did a pretty good job with theirs, it’s a separate but income-based tax. Everyone pays in and everyone gets it, with a cap (67% of prior income with a cap of $1100/wk) for up to 12 weeks. This ensures the payment in and utilization are both progressive. And employers can top up to 100% of income as a benefit if they so choose.

  • olympicyes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I disagree with this law proposal only because I think this should be a federal law instead of a state law. I’d be concerned that businesses would leave the state instead of pay family leave. It’s a disgrace that the USS is the only industrialized country that doesn’t offer this. It’s considered inhumare to take a puppy away from its mother before 8 weeks but humans only need 2 weeks?

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree it should be a federal law, but I also believe starting at the state level gives us a better chance to get it at the federal level.

      • olympicyes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sometimes it works. I guess the precedent is the Massachusetts health care law and Obamacare. I’d love to see anti-abortion republicans railing against mothers staying with their babies.